Could the day 6-10 modeled pattern on the GEFS/EPS be any different. Nothing is going to the hit the conus with the GEFS pattern and EPS almost as slim.
View attachment 23650View attachment 23651
Some of this is likely due to the GEFS having an eastern trough bias whereas the EPS has had little or none of that bias of late. The 0Z EPS mean map you're showing is one that is indicative of danger for the SE US with a closeby TC but as usual the timing of ridge breakdowns is crucial.
Whereas the 0Z EPS suggests the CONUS is likely safe from TD 10, it actually has quite a few TCs for so far out in time from a followup wave. Note the return of a pretty strong WAR/SER as of day 12 and mainly Gulf powerful TCs 2 days later from some members. So, after Imelda, I’m thinking the biggest threat between now and the first few days of October is likely not from TD 10 but instead quite possibly from an as yet formed TC that may not form for awhile somewhere in the western basin:
View attachment 23652
View attachment 23653
1. Yeah, I count about 7 of the 51 from TD 10 that hit the CONUS, which is similar to the number on the 0Z. So, yes, not a done deal yet.
2. In case you or others didn't realize it: the 5 lows near, E, and S of Hispaniola on your 204 hour map are actually from the followup wave that I just referred to that I think may be more dangerous for the CONUS than TD 10 (near end of Sep to start of Oct).
It would stay going west on that ICON setup as well.....
I remember when Florence was suppose to do this.....
View attachment 23656
Florence had chances to escape but never did, but once it got to about Sept 9/10th the ridge over the NE was locked in. We don't have that with TD10, atleast not yet. I have learned to never say never.
View attachment 23657
Yeah way to many people on this board and others like to speak in definite terms concerning weather and well that's just a stupid thing to do in most cases....the upper setup does look like it would be tough to get a US landfall but the models have not been exactly crushing it with the upper level features in the longer range lately either thus the fairly large mid range track changes for Dorian and to a lesser extent Humberto.....
Florence had chances to escape but never did, but once it got to about Sept 9/10th the ridge over the NE was locked in. We don't have that with TD10, atleast not yet. I have learned to never say never.
View attachment 23657
That's why I also don't like to speak in absolute terms but instead say things like 90% chance of no US hit, not currently feeling worried about a US hit, feeling that laying $50 to win $10 is a good bet for no hit, etc, while at the same time saying still not a done deal. I still feel this same way about TD #10 as of now.
5:00 pm discussion comment...
The initial motion estimate is 290/9 kt. The cyclone should move
west-northwestward at an increasingly faster forward speed to the
south of a strong deep-layer ridge.
The track guidance is tightly
clustered, except for the latest HWRF run which is much farther
south at days 3-5. The latest consensus aids were very close to the
previous NHC track, and little overall change to the previous
official foreast was needed.
NHC comments about it in discussion but didn't go with it. Will be interesting to watch.Not buying it yet but the end of the HWRF would be problematic its also further south than the NHC
View attachment 23663
Could this be what the EPS outlier members are catching on to?Not buying it yet but the end of the HWRF would be problematic its also further south than the NHC
View attachment 23663
Could this be what the EPS outlier members are catching on to?