Z
Zander98al
Guest
It appears lack of overwhelming forcing is helping to keep things a bit more isolated if I had to guess. Things to watch that will elevate the threat is lapse rates and if instability is underdone.
We love you man. Keep posting away. This threat looks pretty formidable from what I just saw on modeling, but there’s disagreement. Just wait for the NAM to get into better range thoughWhat's with all the weenies and fails guys?
What's with all the weenies and fails guys?
Be careful using the rgem plots they run way too hot and look much more impressive than realityJust for funnies check the RGEM. Tornado outbreak anyone lol. @Arcc View attachment 129046View attachment 129047View attachment 129048View attachment 129049View attachment 129050View attachment 129051
Relax man. Just ignore the reactions and keep doing your thing man. Just keep fail modes in mentions though, because when you just say things that lean towards something one sided (saying tornado outbreak or things along the line) then people may take it that your hyping, im just trying to help man, as a fellow severe weenieHere's my issue,
This is a weather forum 1st and foremost I would hope. whenever there's possibility of bad weather here typically Georgia-west. It's always fun and most the board members west of that divide enjoy talking and posting stuff amateur or not sure always differing opinions because weather is not a easy thing to forecast. But there's always a clique of sarcastic annoying posters east of Georgia that come in and are either sarcastic butts or spam informative posts from people that live in my state or adjacent states ; analysis from amateurs or just people that love weather like me. and make it a fall in line or thou be criticized and spammed or some stupid crap and they don't even post anything informative or to help anything. Y'all know the clique. We are all adults don't understand why everyone can't just act it and get along or have healthy discourse on weather. It's always been a issue since I've been on the board and I imagine it drives away newbies / amateurs who just like weather and want to post. Almost like a frat house mob east of that divide. Keep doing what y'all do not asking for change or anything but more so a outlook from myself , but eventually the people that come that love weather will get aggravated and either not post or leave.
So that's my qualm.
This makes sense with the h5 and sfc lows moving out of the rockies into the central plains. I do wonder if we get a little bit of weak forcing off the gulf to maybe get a more mcs type mode vs the supercells on the fv3Interesting look by the FV3 for Arkansas Monday afternoon. Although it's usually prone to overdoing supercells lol View attachment 129055View attachment 129056
For us, Carolina’s could catch a little heat with the reinforcing energy swinging on the base of of the trough. But it wouldn’t likely be supercells but probably something linear given more uni flow later onThis makes sense with the h5 and sfc lows moving out of the rockies into the central plains. I do wonder if we get a little bit of weak forcing off the gulf to maybe get a more mcs type mode vs the supercells on the fv3
In a weather forum it’s best not to spam false pretenses and misinformation especially when you’re dealing with a “tornado outbreak” potential. I remember seeing posts about the past severe event and how it would turn into a tornado outbreak. It didn’t. As you get closer in time things become clearer. When you are dealing with messy storm systems you tend to not get big time tornado outbreaks. It’s good to convey the severe weather potential but it’s not good to hype a longer range “tornado outbreak” when in reality it ends up being a straight line wind and isolated tornado set up. Tornados are hard for the atmosphere to create a ton of things have to go right for them to form especially on a widespread scale that constitutes an outbreak. Even in set ups that are seen as slam dunks sometime fail due to the smallest reasons. Weather is fun to track and a fun hobby for some but it’s irresponsible to hype for a week that a tornado outbreak is coming when nothing of the sort ends up verifying. Especially on a board where people go to get somewhat accurate information on the weather and insight they may not get anywhere else.Here's my issue,
This is a weather forum 1st and foremost I would hope. whenever there's possibility of bad weather here typically Georgia-west. It's always fun and most the board members west of that divide enjoy talking and posting stuff amateur or not sure always differing opinions because weather is not a easy thing to forecast. But there's always a clique of sarcastic annoying posters east of Georgia that come in and are either sarcastic butts or spam informative posts from people that live in my state or adjacent states ; analysis from amateurs or just people that love weather like me. and make it a fall in line or thou be criticized and spammed or some stupid crap and they don't even post anything informative or to help anything. Y'all know the clique. We are all adults don't understand why everyone can't just act it and get along or have healthy discourse on weather. It's always been a issue since I've been on the board and I imagine it drives away newbies / amateurs who just like weather and want to post. Almost like a frat house mob east of that divide. Keep doing what y'all do not asking for change or anything but more so a outlook from myself , but eventually the people that come that love weather will get aggravated and either not post or leave.
So that's my qualm.
That seems to really be the key feature for most of us on the board. That initial system off the rockies is the typical dynamics rocketing away from the region with a weakening qlcs moving through.For us, Carolina’s could catch a little heat with the reinforcing energy swinging on the base of of the trough. But it wouldn’t likely be supercells but probably something linear given more uni flow later on
Sorry. Mega tors for sippi and Bama doods. Is that what you were looking for? I'm confusedThink the point I was making didn't come across.. ?
Your right on the point. ?Sorry. Mega tors for sippi and Bama doods. Is that what you were looking for? I'm confused
Why dude? I enjoy your posts and analysis.Not sure how to delete my account lol, so @mods would y'all do me the honor ?
Man don’t do this. Your in my area and I love your analysis. We all get out of control sometimes but we are family and family fight and fuss sometimes but never give up on each other.I'm out, peace.
You got itNot sure how to delete my account lol, so @mods would y'all do me the honor ?
Please don’t do it SD.You got it
He seemed to have issues with being here so I helped out is how I see it. I'm fine with having differing opinions but wishcasting severe and getting mad when people say eh not so sure isn't a great lookPlease don’t do it SD.
They are much more severe weather focused there. Would be a good spot for him to learn from some knowledgeable folks.Wonder if Zander will go to talk weather forum???
He's not out to learn that's the issueThey are much more severe weather focused there. Would be a good spot for him to learn from some knowledgeable folks.
Zander will be missed …Man don’t do this. Your in my area and I love your analysis. We all get out of control sometimes but we are family and family fight and fuss sometimes but never give up on each other.
This is exactly what I see when I look at this setup. Wildcard is energy at base of trough that can swing through and get stuff going, that would Be problematic. but that’s a big IF. The stuff I saw this morning on here was insane. Saying tornado outbreak for AL and looking at lower res models like the rgem/long range nam, with other model disagreement is extremely misleading. Sure it could happen, but there are fails modes as well. Which deserve to be mentioned at much as the chances it could overachieve. What makes a great forecaster vs a bias forecaster is seeing things that can go wrong, Vs seeing what you want. Look at mark margavage on Twitter as another example of a bias forecasterIn an effort to try to get this train back on the tracks. The main thing I'm still seeing with this system is the way the shortwave is ejecting and thus keeping the main surface low farther to the north which would suggest a more linear storm mode and less dynamic support as the system moves east. That surface low is trying to book it to the north and east. The thermodynamics will definitely be there widespread dews in the 60s. Right now my gut tells me this would will be more of a damaging wind and flooding setup with a lesser chance for a tornado.
In an effort to try to get this train back on the tracks. The main thing I'm still seeing with this system is the way the shortwave is ejecting and thus keeping the main surface low farther to the north which would suggest a more linear storm mode and less dynamic support as the system moves east. That surface low is trying to book it to the north and east. The thermodynamics will definitely be there widespread dews in the 60s. Right now my gut tells me this would will be more of a damaging wind and flooding setup with a lesser chance for a tornado.
Zander had a valid point. Yes he may be extreme with some of his outlooks and terminology, but the point he was making is that if whatever is being discussed doesn’t involve the Carolina’s it gets crapped on by a lot of people and discredited. Move this to banter if you feel it is necessary but this is SOUTHERNwx not just CAROLINAwx.He seemed to have issues with being here so I helped out is how I see it. I'm fine with having differing opinions but wishcasting severe and getting mad when people say eh not so sure isn't a great look
Zander had a valid point. Yes he may be extreme with some of his outlooks and terminology, but the point he was making is that if whatever is being discussed doesn’t involve the Carolina’s it gets crapped on by a lot of people and discredited. Move this to banter if you feel it is necessary but this is SOUTHERNwx not just CAROLINAwx.