more ice correct?
Depends on evolution/track; but for our area; probably.
more ice correct?
He’s really good - I put a lot of stock in his posts.Interesting post from ILMRoss over on American making the case that the 18z GFS of not right.
I think the board would like the hybrid. If the other scenario takes place, the noise from NC will sound like the Sports talk shows in AL today.Yeah and the gefs was in our favor definitely. Time will tell soon
Agreed. Regardless of which way it ultimately ends up (amped or flatter), it's a real tightrope until that energy is diving southward and I don't know that this is going to be settled definitively until Thursday evening or Friday when it's actually onshore. I think the ICON solution was a little wonky and probably extreme, but something in-between the ICON and the current op GFS/Euro solutions is probably the most likely scenario based on the current trends.One-two fast trends with the cutoff off cali or the more digging with the southern part of the energy and we’re gonna go back to a flatter/sheared look, it’s close View attachment 104061
Shall I post the GEFS trend?
SureShall I post the GEFS trend?
Burrel, great to see you, welcome! Always appreciate your insight for the upstate!Splitting hairs here but the 18z euro looks slightly more positively tilted compared to the 12z trough. Def more positive tilted than 18z gfs.
At 500 looks a bit north but not as amped. if I’m seeing correctly.18z Euro Ens Mean is a tick more suppressed
weaker, slower and more chance to grab some cold before scooting ...Yeah this run has a weaker low pressure around the gulf coast View attachment 104075
Don’t think it has the same argument as the gefs vs GFS as the EC control has the same exact grid space/resolution as the EPS members itselfThe 18z Euro Control looks just like the 18z GFS though as far as track.
Good to see you in here burrel...just in time with massive CAD moving in!Splitting hairs here but the 18z euro looks slightly more positively tilted compared to the 12z trough. Def more positive tilted than 18z gfs.
This looks better for MS/Al for sureEuro Control came north some View attachment 104078
Do you mind posting 12z vrs 18z? Thanks if you can.Euro Control came north some View attachment 104078
Euro Control came north some View attachment 104078
That would be a little morw in-line with the 2014 fab feb snow.Euro Control came north some View attachment 104078
If someone was making me lay down money, you are absolutely right.Webb may argue that the OP GFS may need to be taken seriously despite disagreements with its ensembles, but OP GFS vs GEFS & EPS? Idk chief. I’d like to hear his thoughts on that but I’d put money on EPS every time
The question basically boils down to: is this a resolution issue or is varying the initial conditions slightly somehow causing this? The fact there are still a handful of members well-inland makes me think it's something to do with the initial conditions.
The control itched north and that kind of discredits the explanation he made. Personally I’ve seen the GFS erode CAD and drive LP right through CAD for years now. This is exactly what I expect from it in this range.Webb may argue that the OP GFS may need to be taken seriously despite disagreements with its ensembles, but OP GFS vs GEFS & EPS? Idk chief. I’d like to hear his thoughts on that but I’d put money on EPS every time
Believe you have a solid hypothesis thereThe question basically boils down to: is this a resolution issue or is varying the initial conditions slightly somehow causing this? The fact there are still a handful of members well-inland makes me think it's something to do with the initial conditions.
If it was the oppsite. GFS off the coast and both sets of ens inland. The GFS op would be thrown out , no questions askedWebb may argue that the OP GFS may need to be taken seriously despite disagreements with its ensembles, but OP GFS vs GEFS & EPS? Idk chief. I’d like to hear his thoughts on that but I’d put money on EPS every time