Webberweather53
Meteorologist
For the 2nd week in a row, OISSTv2 weekly NINO 3.4 SSTAs fall, now down to +0.5C...
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/wksst8110.for
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/wksst8110.for
For the 2nd week in a row, OISSTv2 weekly NINO 3.4 SSTAs fall, now down to +0.5C...
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/wksst8110.for
Don't know if you consider yourself "deep south" (as I guess that's a relative term), but being the eternal optimist, remember this exchange from a couple days ago: http://southernwx.com/community/threads/enso-updates.146/page-8#post-33870I personally believe things are looking VERY bleak for an El Niño to develop from what I'm seeing but I'm no expert.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't know if you consider yourself "deep south" (as I guess that's a relative term), but being the eternal optimist, remember this exchange from a couple days ago: http://southernwx.com/community/threads/enso-updates.146/page-8#post-33870
I know. Just trying to be upbeat ...I was referring to our locations like Gainesville and Savannah, where it hardly ever snows with significant accumulations, regardless of ENSO. In other words, there's no evidence per history that the already very low chance is lowered any more if there's no Nino vs if there is one though obviously the sample size of significant snows is small and, therefore, statistical credibility is rather low. However, for areas much further inland where significant snowfalls are way more frequent than SAV/GNV, like the specified Atlanta as well as where most active posters live, it would be better to have El Nino than not have it per longterm snowfall stats for chances for a major snowstorm.
I know. Just trying to be upbeat ...
The two are not necessarily mutually exclusive ... LOLAnd I'm just trying to be candid.
A winter like 1989-90 would be fine with me. Or perhaps like 2015-16.I hope we get a good winter.
Dad gum, Man!With TAO and the weeklies having recently cooled 0.2+ and the July SOI headed for a sold +, I have no choice but to reduce the odds in my mind for an oncoming El Nino this year. Previously, I had said the chances were "very good".
If one wants El Nino, one cannot like how high Tahiti's SLP is going to end up this month. For 7/1-20. it is averaging 1015. I'm projecting it will approach or even reach 1019 tomorrow and still be near 1018 the day after. Here are my educated guesses for the rest of the month based on the 12Z models:
7/21: 1019
7/22: 1018
7/23: 1016.5
7/24: 1015
7/25: 1014.5
7/26: 1014
7/27: 1014.5
7/28: 1015
7/29: 1015
7/30: 1015
If the above projections were to come close to verifying, the full July 2017 Tahiti averaged SLP would come out to ~1015.2, which is a full mb above the longterm average for all years since 1950. That 1015.2 may even be a little conservatively low as the EPS would imply that it get up to ~1015.35. Here are some Tahiti averages for various oncoming ENSO:
Strong Nino: 1013.4
Weak to Mod Nino: 1013.9
Weak to mod Nina: 1014.3
Strong Nina: 1015.2
So, Tahiti's 2017 SLP is now projected to come in near the average for an oncoming strong La Nina. As a matter of fact, every single instance of Tahiti being 1015.0+ in July since 1950 (8 of them) was an oncoming La Nina year. OTOH, every single one of those 8 cases had an AMJ trimonthly Nino 3.4 that was negative vs 2017's +0.5. So, I'm not at all saying it means we're likely headed for La Nina. But I am saying that the chances for El Nino have dropped quite a bit in my mind over the last month. Consider this: for every El Nino since 1950 that was oncoming (24 of them), Tahiti's SLP was never higher than 1014.7!
Dad gum, Man!
Fabulous analysis (except for the prognosis).
Thanks, Larry!
Maybe something else will help us this year! I've been good, so Santa may yet reward ... LOL
Best as Always,
Phil
ECMWF ensemble suite is forecasting yet another major easterly trade wind burst, as strong or stronger than the current one, to take hold over the central Pacific near the end of the month and going into the first part of August
View attachment 693