I have never heard that.A question. Who has come to be taught that Eve was with Satan sexually in the Garden? More and more churches now teach this.
I have never heard that.A question. Who has come to be taught that Eve was with Satan sexually in the Garden? More and more churches now teach this.
Most have not till recently.I have never heard that.
Where did you hear about it?Most have not till recently.
I listen to Ravi Zacharias every week. "Let my people think" is a wonderful program. This guy is probably the most educated man I have ever heard when it comes to the argument of atheism vs. Christianity.Some excellent questions. I put in a few thoughts above. There are also some great videos on some of these questions by much wiser theologians than me. Try some Ravi Zacharias, Vince Vitale, Frank Turek q&a on Youtube.
I am fully aware of what you are saying. I agree with you on one part, Revelation is classic Jewish apocalyptic literature. However, we disagree on the time-frame for the events that are described in the Book. Please tell me when did the the 21 judgments occur? When was the anti-Christ here. "Mark of the Beast"? Don't give me that old argument about Nero being the anti-Christ. It doesn't fit with the whole "right-hand" and "forehead" mark that had to be received in order to buy and sell. When did the 1000 year reign of Christ occur? I don't remember a thousand year period of no Satan. I will not convince you, but just listen to Dr Jimmy DeYoung lay out the time-table for the book of the Revelation. It might just open up your eyes to a few things.I understand how you feel and there are plenty who view Revelation as you. But please understand that I have studied the book in depth, both academically and as a pastor/teacher. Through my education and continual learning, I have become settled on what I said above, though I was much like you once upon a time.
Revelation is classic Jewish apocalyptic literature, which uses symbols to convey the message of hope and final victory while describing the ongoing battle between the forces of good/evil. The symbolism in the book had to have been understandable to John's original audience. The entire book is written first and foremost to them:
"The revelation from Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John, who testifies to everything he saw—that is, the word of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ. Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear it and take to heart what is written in it, because the time is near. " Rev. 1:1-3.
When John wrote Revelation, he sent it to the seven churches, where it would be read aloud to each congregation. This was standard practice when an apostle sent correspondence to churches. It is clear from the prologue that John intended the entire book/letter to be read and understood by the churches. We cannot, we must not, begin to interpret any part of the book until we first wrestle with what it meant to the original audience. Failure to do this is a failure of fundamental biblical hermeneutics.
I could go on at length, but I will stop here.
If god is real why would he allow pandemics? Hurricanes?
Here’s one note about death that is often overlooked from a Christian perspective: Death is, in my view, a gracious gift from God. Adam and Eve had access to the “tree of life”, but their access was cutoff after the fall. On one hand that was a consequence of their rebellion. But on the other hand it was a gracious gift in that they would not have to suffer in this fallen world forever. Furthermore, God’s Grace is seen in that he provides access to the tree of life once more through faith in Christ (Rev.2:7).
A few years back my cousins fiancee died suddenly 2 days before xmas. At the wake a woman told my cousin not to forget that everything god does he does because he loves her. So while god ignored their prayers for him to get over his severe cold were ignored and he later died in his sleep it was all because he loved my cousin. Such bologne.
My anger was hard to contain.
I can’t really agree with that either. Sure we can have no fear of death because of Christ and I don’t fear death but I don’t know about you, I’d much rather go the way of Enoch or Elijah than have to face the feeling of my mortal body faltering. I have a feeling Adam and Eve and every one else would rather go that route as well. Death is a punishment. Death is the final enemy a Christian will face, but as Paul states that enemy will be swallowed up in victory.
I don't deny that it is part of God's judgment. However, keep in mind that God's judgment is always joined with his grace. This is best illustrated in the cross, where God's judgment is poured out upon Christ, but at the same time his grace is poured out as well--offering eternal life for all who believe in Christ's atoning sacrifice and resurrection.
We all would like to live without facing death--but we must because that is the consequence of the fall. But praise be to God that death releases us from the curse of this fallen world. I would much rather die than to face eternity in toil and sweat on this broken planet. So in that sense, death is a part of God's grace.
And so? Because if you want a real debate on this issue you will lose.Not the King James Version....
If you remember, our original debate was the time-table for the Book of the Revelation, not whether or not current events (such as the Corona virus) were mentioned in that book. By the way, I believe any other translation takes something away from the true meaning of God's Word.But I have yet to encounter KJV only person who stays in the debate to the end. So you’d be the first. But I’d be happy to take you on.
Two things: this wasn’t posted as part of our debate.If you remember, our original debate was the time-table for the Book of the Revelation, not whether or not current events (such as the Corona virus) were mentioned in that book. By the way, I believe any other translation takes something away from the true meaning of God's Word.
Turn the other cheek, my friend ...Two things: this wasn’t posted as part of our debate.
You responded to my post with “It’s not KJV.” I’ve been around enough people like you to know what that means.
If you think the KJV is the only true version of God’s Word I have zero respect for you because you have absolutely no clue what you’re even talking about. KJV onlyism is one of the nastiest heresies on this side of the cross and it represent a gross misunderstanding of how the Scriptures have been handed down to us.
You introduced this topic. Not me. But if you think you can go toe to toe with me then bring it. But I have no sympathy for your ilk and you will lose, or repent. Your choice.
Getting mighty defensive about those other interpretations aren't we? My grandfather was a Southern Baptist pastor for many years. The KJV was the only Bible we knew growing up. We understood it just fine even as children. Why do we think that it doesn't work now? Just a question....Two things: this wasn’t posted as part of our debate.
You responded to my post with “It’s not KJV.” I’ve been around enough people like you to know what that means.
If you think the KJV is the only true version of God’s Word I have zero respect for you because you have absolutely no clue what you’re even talking about. KJV onlyism is one of the nastiest heresies on this side of the cross and it represent a gross misunderstanding of how the Scriptures have been handed down to us.
You introduced this topic. Not me. But if you think you can go toe to toe with me then bring it. But I have no sympathy for your ilk and you will lose, or repent. Your choice.