• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Learning Model Discussion 2/9-2/10

I'm done with this whole forum right now. I'm not going to be wasting anymore time by reading who is putting out the best observations and or analyzes. We're here as a group and we should give all each other credit.

People view things differently and they view things that best fits them. Someone shouldn't bash someone for viewing something differently and what that person is looking for. When I look at these models I look at everything and not just the H5 maps. Also, someone should not try to control someone into what they are looking for. I said that there would be a storm during the 10th-13th and my prediction is coming true regardless of it not affecting the SE states.

How did I predict it? Based off of a lot of things and not just H5 maps. So, with these threads coming off topic and wasting time, I'm done for now on this whole forum.



Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk

Don,
This may not be a popular thing to say right now, but I hope you don't leave the forum. Whereas you do have a unique and controversial way of forecasting, I think it is more interesting when a forum has different views with robust discussion. (I don't at all mean fighting/name calling when I say robust discussion.)
 
Don,
This may not be a popular thing to say right now, but I hope you don't leave the forum. Whereas you do have a unique and controversial way of forecasting, I think it is more interesting when a forum has different views with robust discussion. (I don't at all mean fighting/name calling when I say robust discussion.)
Yeah - this is not American
 
So, do we have a storm threat of not?

No, Brick, it is pretty close to dead now IMO. The GFS suite has been horrendous with this. The GFS cold bias, which I think is indirectly relevant, has been awful.
 
Did the Euro run today?

Yep...it wasn't good. More in line with the 12z GFS with the energy being stung out and not digging until it's out to sea.

12z Models are all over the place with ridge height and energy orientation north of Washington state. Something to watch. I'd say this one is over but until the models agree on speed and look of this energy, I'm still watching. 12z NAM is interesting with this look
b281bef531bd368a0526bd1da394ccc3.jpg


Canadian is way too north with the ridge
395b5919fecc9b53349f931780833349.jpg


Optimism level at about 5% haha.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Yeah - this is not American

One thing that has attracted me to this bb is that almost all major posters have gotten along pretty well. Also, with it being new, there are no cliques to worry about. All are treated like equals. I hope it remains that way as that is quite refreshing. As time goes along, these things can change due to human nature. We need to be careful.
 
I haven't declared this dead, but I'm about ready to, if there's no improvement at 0z I think this threat is done. It's a shame but a model that is typically cold biased in the CMC being warm when it showed a storm earlier on is a bad sign.
 
One thing that has attracted me to this bb is that almost all major posters have gotten along pretty well. Also, with it being new, there are no cliques to worry about. All are treated like equals. I hope it remains that way as that is quite refreshing. As time goes along, these things can change due to human nature. We need to be careful.
Appropriate for a Sunday I suppose - Amen Brother!

btw - Amen literally translates to "let it be"
 
where does the arrogance on the other board come from please? they are mocking the people here over this thread and honestly the people with SENSE are posting here......while the other board is mostly clowns playing silly games.
 
One thing that has attracted me to this bb is that almost all major posters have gotten along pretty well. Also, with it being new, there are no cliques to worry about. All are treated like equals. I hope it remains that way as that is quite refreshing. As time goes along, these things can change due to human nature. We need to be careful.

I totally agree with Larry here. I like the fact that this board is focused on the weather and learning while still being lighthearted. Pessimism and sarcasm 24/7 wears thin very quickly. I would hate to see anyone leave who is genuine in their passion for weather. That works both ways though. Being open minded and willing to listen and learn will keep you young at heart. I was way wrong with some model analysis I gave yesterday. I have tried to learn from folks who have more experience than me. That will hopefully improve my take on things as time goes by.
 
When a potential threat starts to dominate a pattern discussion thread, I feel it's better to move it to it's own thread. Creating this thread wasn't a fail at all, regardless of the outcome.

I guess it's become normal and expected to threaten to ban your core members if they make a thread and it doesn't work out. We don't do that here.
 
Don,
This may not be a popular thing to say right now, but I hope you don't leave the forum. Whereas you do have a unique and controversial way of forecasting, I think it is more interesting when a forum has different views with robust discussion. (I don't at all mean fighting/name calling when I say robust discussion.)
I'm going to stay here on the forum, I'm just cooling off the steam. I'm not that kind of person to leave things behind and not to be hateful.

Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
 
I totally agree with Larry here. I like the fact that this board is focused on the weather and learning while still being lighthearted. Pessimism and sarcasm 24/7 wears thin very quickly. I would hate to see anyone leave who is genuine in their passion for weather. That works both ways though. Being open minded and willing to listen and learn will keep you young at heart. I was way wrong with some model analysis I gave yesterday. I have tried to learn from folks who have more experience than me. That will hopefully improve my take on things as time goes by.
Yep one thing we are trying to do here is promote discussion and learning. I think there is a good amount of useful info posted here daily. I guess if people want to post witty 1 liners and constant cynicism they have their place.

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
 
When a potential threat starts to dominate a pattern discussion thread, I feel it's better to move it to it's own thread. Creating this thread wasn't a fail at all, regardless of the outcome.

I guess it's become normal and expected to threaten to ban your core members if they make a thread and it doesn't work out. We don't do that here.

There's still going to be a system just not the one we want...LOL!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I guess if people want to post witty 1 liners and constant cynicism they have their place.
witty one liners to denigrate - bad; witty positive one liners to keep things in focus - are those bad?

(rules of the road?)
 
witty one liners to denigrate - bad; witty positive one liners to keep things in focus - are those bad?
I have no problem with funny banter at times and people inserting sarcasm into threads. The gifs are a great example. My problem lies when someone constantly post lines of negative drivel for the sake of if.

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
 
When a potential threat starts to dominate a pattern discussion thread, I feel it's better to move it to it's own thread. Creating this thread wasn't a fail at all, regardless of the outcome.

I guess it's become normal and expected to threaten to ban your core members if they make a thread and it doesn't work out. We don't do that here.

I agree 100% with this. I think that once a storm threat starts dominating a thread regardless of how far out or how remote the chance the storm has to materialize, it is best it be in its own thread so as not to overly dominate a general pattern discussion thread. Also, hindsight is 20:20. It is easy to say after the fact or getting closer to the fact that there won't be a winter storm. But it was hard to know with high confidence when this thread was started that there wouldn't be a winter storm due largely to the GFS suite.
So, what is the big harm that this thread exists even if no SE winter storm materializes?
 
So the euro says if you want snow you better go to Green Bay or Maine. I think we are all just a little frustrated with the way this winter continues to play out. I feel I should probably step away from watching the weather models for a few days but it's doubtful that will happen before march.
 
Back
Top