• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Tropical Major Hurricane Florence

0b479fbb0fe86a4105ef286993e3cdd7.png
.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
GFS is being goofy. Probably too far north, and CMC too far south.
 
May be the first time I’ve ever seen a model show a cat 4/5 hurricane move SW off the east coast as the GFS depicts. Smh

Why is that hard to believe ? The steering flow collapses and the trough is way back to the west . It could easily stall and meander for a few days


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Guys, real quick... why does a delay in intensification lead to a more southerly track? I've always seen that but never understood. I'm assuming it has to do with the counterclockwise spin?
 
Guys, real quick... why does a delay in intensification lead to a more southerly track? I've always seen that but never understood. I'm assuming it has to do with the counterclockwise spin?

because a weaker storm is more likely to be steered by the westerlies(the usual flow in the Atlantic)

a stronger storm is more likely to feel a weakness and pull north
 
Last edited:
Why is that hard to believe ? The steering flow collapses and the trough is way back to the west . It could easily stall and meander for a few days


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But not a Cat 4/5, sure it could loop but it would be much weaker at that point
 
But not a Cat 4/5, sure it could loop but it would be much weaker at that point

Yes it would be much weaker at that point because of many things upwelling being a big one . The point I was making was a stalling/ looping solution isn’t that unreasonable given the lack of steering and the fact the trough is way back out west . It’s clearly shown on this gfs run as the trough finally kicks it east a week from Tuesday .




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
We all know the gfs has all kinds of issues . But holy hell , loop the 500mb chart from 00z last night to 12z today and look at the complete flips


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I'm really starting to wonder about the overall strength of Florence atleast in the next two days. Firstly the circulation keeps sucking in very dry air from south and from around the other "system" from the NW. Secondly, that other circulation is almost acting like a TUTT and is clearly visible on WV. Unless it fills or moves on, it may end up keeping shear higher for longer and keep allowing the dry air to penetrate the core. It is also helping draw the dry air NW.
 
I'm really starting to wonder about the overall strength of Florence atleast in the next two days. Firstly the circulation keeps sucking in very dry air from south and from around the other "system" from the NW. Secondly, that other circulation is almost acting like a TUTT and is clearly visible on WV. Unless it fills or moves on, it may end up keeping shear higher for longer and keep allowing the dry air to penetrate the core.
Wouldn’t this help keep this hurricane on a western path longer?
 
Agreed. A slightly weaker ridge would get you a coastal scraper like the GFS shows.

The UK shifted NE this run too. Good to see.
Indeed, as long as the NE shifts shift it on ots.... otherwise we are back in the cross hairs. Hoping a full ots turn with this one for everyone's sake
 
Have to hope the GFS is onto something, but it is not usually the model you want to bet on.
 
Yeah pretty big intensity discrepancy between the previous euro and the cmc compared to the new run.

I think it's also attributable to how these models accept and assimilate certain types of data, the "acceptable" range during the processing stage for HH data is much larger than it is for satellite estimates for example in the ECMWF model. This acceptable data range is determined by nearby data so you could probably imagine given how tight the pressure gradients are across the scale of a TC (esp a small one) why ECMWF would do this.
 
Back
Top