The reason there is not much of a warm nose is because the system is so dynamic that the upward motion keeps the column cold… that’s actually the same thing that happened with the ‘93 Superstorm for CLT metro… the changeover to snow occurred as the low was moving directly overheadVerbatim, there’s not much of a warm nose. However, I don’t buy any solution that predicts 36” unless it’s under 60 hrs.
View attachment 109788
Still thought looks like a good amount of hits and a good amount of just barely missed type of storms.. definitely great at this range .. everyone is still in the game on this oneNot really support from the GEFS however of a system digging that far SW
Toss every model run 7 days out if you are expecting verbatim results. Sun angle??? In January??? Our temps have been generally below average for 3 weeks...In January... Worried about soils temps???SMHnot buying this solution at all. i would expect the sleet line to be 5-10 more miles further inland. also snow maps not taking into effect soil temps and sun angle. toss
I think he was being sarcastic. I think he's a believer in the big picture potential.Toss every model run 7 days out if you are expecting verbatim results. Sun angle??? In January??? Our temps have been generally below average for 3 weeks...In January... Worried about soils temps???SMH
Next weekend has been showing the potential for something big somewhere in the SE for awhile. It is now getting within 7 days. It's not a slam dunk. It never is for the SE. But, it is certainly worth our attention.
Yeah, the GFS has snowfall rates of 3 inches an hour. Warm ground ain't doing squat lol.Toss every model run 7 days out if you are expecting verbatim results. Sun angle??? In January??? Our temps have been generally below average for 3 weeks...In January... Worried about soils temps???SMH
Next weekend has been showing the potential for something big somewhere in the SE for awhile. It is now getting within 7 days. It's not a slam dunk. It never is for the SE. But, it is certainly worth our attention.
in a good spotNot really support from the GEFS however of a system digging that far SW
3.67 QPF and ONLY 31.7”?? Come on GFS.not buying this solution at all. i would expect the sleet line to be 5-10 more miles further inland. also snow maps not taking into effect soil temps and sun angle. toss
To me this is a perfectly reasonable look from the ensembles. We’re in the ballpark. If it slides further east in subsequent runs then yeahhhhhh time to lower your expectationsin a good spot![]()
Yep.. we often don’t do to well with these but when we do we do really well, should be a fun week whether it happens or notzero CAD.. all dynamically driven by ULL.. temps marginal
And you know this. Specifics will change but you have to think we make a run at something significant again next weekend@SD gon love this one, this is amazing ! View attachment 109797
Yep. all members have the pieces, even the wide right membersAnd you know this. Specifics will change but you have to think we make a run at something significant again next weekend
Temps looked just like that on ensembles for this past storm we just went through .. they can see significant storm signals far out.. so I can see how this event was seen in terms of major temp changes and such (those usually come with some sort of big event on the beginning or end of them) so the fact that we continue to see this signal in our medium range right now is another great sign that something else is coming for someone in the SE