• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Pattern Jan 2025 Powered by Rheem AC

The 1" total probs jump from 10 to 30% over RDU on this map between Jan 7 & 11 & you just showed a map of mean snowfall between 2 dates, which is obviously not the same thing at all because of outliers.

Anyways... moving on.

View attachment 156828
January 8th at 00z (the end of the first week of January) is at 20%. It ends at 30%. Anyways, you and I both know how ridiculous this is to be analyzing GEFS like this.
gfs-ensemble-all-avg-se-snow_ge_1-6294400.png
 
January 8th at 00z (the end of the first week of January) is at 20%. It ends at 30%. Anyways, you and I both know how ridiculous this is to be analyzing GEFS like this.
View attachment 156832

I guess the point I was trying to make here was that the pattern in general probably will be more supportive for something as we get a little deeper into early-mid January & the models (for what they are worth) are already beginning to hint at that. The EPS is a better example than the GEFS obviously because it keeps the trough at the beginning of the month more tightly wound up/progressive, favoring drier NW flow.
 
I guess the point I was trying to make here was that the pattern in general probably will be more supportive for something as we get a little deeper into early-mid January & the models (for what they are worth) are already beginning to hint at that. The EPS is a better example than the GEFS obviously because it keeps the trough at the beginning of the month more tightly wound up/progressive, favoring drier NW flow.
The hilarious thing is I agree with you. We both know a receding -NAO is statistically when RDU is most likely to see a big snowfall. But right now, there just isn't much signal either way IMO. If a few things adjusted, I still hold out we could pop a low. Is it likely to happen? Absolutely not. Later is definitely more likely, but it's beyond opportunity #1 and not only that, what happens with the first trough will influence the second one, so I just don't put much focus on it yet...but that time will come (hopefully).
 
It's a great professional conversation. Let it go. Part of what we're here for, right?
Yes. However, in the past this has digressed very quickly. Call it PTSD for me, if you will. Nothing wrong with the back-and-forth as long as it does not get personal. Both are very solid posters on this forum and their content is greatly appreciated.
 
Yes. However, in the past this has digressed very quickly. Call it PTSD for me, if you will. Nothing wrong with the back-and-forth as long as it does not get personal. Both are very solid posters on this forum and their content is greatly appreciated.
Agreed. I know and appreciate that sometimes it requires the thankless adult job of sitting down on the floor cross-legged with all the toddlers to keep things fair and in order.
 
Euro AI with another heavy -NAO run, here days 6 to 14

Y2kW07L.gif
 
Yes. However, in the past this has digressed very quickly. Call it PTSD for me, if you will. Nothing wrong with the back-and-forth as long as it does not get personal. Both are very solid posters on this forum and their content is greatly appreciated.
Fortunately, this isn't nowhere near the level of WxRisk/Meteotrade back in the day on Wright Weather. I've thoroughly enjoyed the debate with 1300m and Webb
 
Fortunately, this isn't nowhere near the level of WxRisk/Meteotrade back in the day on Wright Weather. I've thoroughly enjoyed the debate with 1300m and Webb

I think the the threats after the first week of January are more likely to occur but it’s impossible to know the outcome for sure! That’s what makes weather so exciting. The pac jet being biased to extend more has thrown a major wrench in forecast this winter. Even days ago the Jan. 3rd to 6th threat looked better than it does now due to pac jet extension being stronger than modeled. But I think with patience this could be an exciting period. Webb nailed the idea down weeks ago on the macro level, just have to see how the finer details play out over next couple weeks! 1300m is also an excellent knowledgeable mind to have on this forum. Without debate and difference of opinion the world would be boring, keeping things civil during disagreement can bring knowledge to less educated posters like me!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Euro AI with another heavy -NAO run, here days 6 to 14

Y2kW07L.gif
Wonder if we trend to less -EPO but that might encourage the -NAO to stick around, given the -EPO favors a +NAMT event which would eventually extend the Atlantic jet and completely nukes the -NAO. likely why the AIFS keeps it going
 
Euro Weeklies and GEFS Extended both hold similar looks for each week from Jan 3-10 to Jan 15-22. Pretty unusual to see that consistency from these products with respect to both holding the look that long and with them being that similar. The magnitude of the anomalies weaken out in time with it being a long-range ensemble of members.

mvyRP4i.gif


a1tMKVz.gif



Those forecasts look like a blend of Dec-Mar from 69-70, 80-81, and 85-86. Chilly, but dry (not surprising). I'll take the chilly part though if we can get it and work on the dry part later.

KD6nxXA.png


ozYBWaC.png


YX8OB8o.png
 
Wonder if we trend to less -EPO but that might encourage the -NAO to stick around, given the -EPO favors a +NAMT event which would eventually extend the Atlantic jet and completely nukes the -NAO. likely why the AIFS keeps it going
I'd be all for the power -NAO between the 2 options assuming a TPV appendage is trapped...would help with more storminess and farther south storm track
 
I'd be all for the power -NAO between the 2 options assuming a TPV appendage is trapped...would help with more storminess and farther south storm track
Yeah it’s Jan. We don’t need the entire kitchen sink thrown, at least up here. That AIFS solution is good enough with the -NAO dominating and a semblance of a western ridge. The TPV moves close enough for some of the colder air aloft to be thrown into Canada so imo it’s a higher end solution. Been a while since we’ve had a functioning -NAO blocking with good consequences aka an actual 50/50 low coupled to it with a suppressive height field all the way to the EC itself and not just the more western SE. Jan 2021 came close a couple instances with that -NAO but just to warm because the entire NA got flushed out prior to it
 
Euro Weeklies and GEFS Extended both hold similar looks for each week from Jan 3-10 to Jan 15-22. Pretty unusual to see that consistency from these products with respect to both holding the look that long and with them being that similar. The magnitude of the anomalies weaken out in time with it being a long-range ensemble of members.

mvyRP4i.gif


a1tMKVz.gif



Those forecasts look like a blend of Dec-Mar from 69-70, 80-81, and 85-86. Chilly, but dry (not surprising). I'll take the chilly part though if we can get it and work on the dry part later.

KD6nxXA.png


ozYBWaC.png


YX8OB8o.png


@SD would approve of 1980-81

IMG_4108.png
 
Back
Top