Some of those EPS members look like January 2000 lol
No, but tonight's 0z run should help us determine if the OP runs are seeing something that the ensembles are not. Let's see who blinks first.Can anyone remember a similar storm where the ensembles of both models were in near agreement but virulently disagreed with their OPs who sorta agreed with each other? I surely can’t.
Especially at the 5 day mark. EPS should be leading the way.4 out of 50 track inland. 46 off the coast. Hard to bet against the gefs and eps tracks with 90% to the right side of the east coast
The highs in the 18z also show slight improvement here. Splitting hairs but the main high near the great lakes is a half tick west and looks like it is trying to open another isobar, ditto for the Iowa high. Then a 1029 opens over N WI. Not a huge difference but could be important for cold press nonetheless, especially with the low a tad weaker and half a tick South.Yeah this run has a weaker low pressure around the gulf coast View attachment 104075
4 inch snow mean in the Midlands of SC?? WOW! Lets hope the EPS and the GEFS is on to something with much less amped up low.If so, maybe the I-20 corrdior areas in SC could be back in the game for signifcant snowfall and Ice may not be a problem at all. One can hope.This change at H5 might be the reason for colder/snowier, notice the energy is slightly more sheared/stretched from that cutoff near California. View attachment 104083View attachment 104087View attachment 104084View attachment 104085View attachment 104086
The paper I referenced had the chart showing Control was slightly more accurate days 6 to 11, Op was slightly more accurate days 2-4Didn’t grit say the control was better in the long range anyways? I may be confusing him and it’s the other way around but I think I remember him saying the control was better around the day 8-10+ time frame
You have a pointIf it was the oppsite. GFS off the coast and both sets of ens inland. The GFS op would be thrown out , no questions asked
Southernwx days 3-5The paper I referenced had the chart showing Control was slightly more accurate days 6 to 11, Op was slightly more accurate days 2-4
I really believe this is the key.This change at H5 might be the reason for colder/snowier, notice the energy is slightly more sheared/stretched from that cutoff near California. View attachment 104083View attachment 104087View attachment 104084View attachment 104085View attachment 104086
What about day 5? Sorry had to ask.The paper I referenced had the chart showing Control was slightly more accurate days 6 to 11, Op was slightly more accurate days 2-4
KCAE…Just remember we’ve been burned one then once.View attachment 104089
You and I both know this typically doesn’t end well for us.Look at that control though; Quite concerning.
Can you post klqk please