It'll be a lot worse than that once the NAM gets a hold of it![]()
This is strange…one heck of a warm nose
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I've seen comparisons like this a few times on here recently.. it is important not to compare an ensemble mean as a deterministic solution! The ensemble mean is NOT a forecast output and shouldn't be treated as one. Rather, there is usually clusters that ensemble members group into. It is much more useful to see how different clusters stack up over time, as ensemble means can be extraordinarily misleading.GFS verse The Gefs at Hr 96. Makes a big difference
![]()
![]()
Man thats throwback stuff there. Imagine some folks today without clown maps...lolSave us with some black and white CMC charts will ya?
I see a classic CAD ice storm set up,
Those maps come with a free pair of vintage bell bottom pants and big white belt you knowLooks just like the GFS...tucks it into Delmarva....like old times Grit. It's never easy and usually rains. I blame RainCold for this.?View attachment 103792View attachment 103793
Someone mentioned it yesterday but unfortunately 50/50 seemingly always move out faster than modeledSo, we're losing the length of time the 50 /50 is hanging around, and allowing our high to make a beeline stage right. That's why the low is driving inland.
Based on that how cold that ICON run was even with it’s known warm bias at this range, I give this map some validity… it’s also one of the reasons why I’m still not sold on this highly amped system the GFS is showing… I have a feeling the end result is gonna be somewhere in the middle between the GFS and EURO/UK… even if it’s closer to the GFS, I think with that strong of a CAD we could see a good bit more overrunning snowfall breakout earlier ahead of the system.. much like February 2014
I think ANYWHERE in the NC mountains will be good...People familiar with western NC storm tracks, how comfortable would y’all be saying Maggie valley is a favorable spot to book a place and stay this weekend?
Basically, the energy is closing off sooner, slowing it down and thus allowing that to occur plus the more amped up solution more times than not trend poleward. I'm still not sold we don't see more ice, the HP getting a little stronger with a decent CAD setup, still plenty to sort out imhoSo, we're losing the length of time the 50 /50 is hanging around, and allowing our high to make a beeline stage right. That's why the low is driving inland.
If the gfs track holds I would stay in highlands cashiers or lake toxaway.People familiar with western NC storm tracks, how comfortable would y’all be saying Maggie valley is a favorable spot to book a place and stay this weekend?
Go to Highlands/Cashiers. If you want ski,then hit up Maggie Valley, cataloochePeople familiar with western NC storm tracks, how comfortable would y’all be saying Maggie valley is a favorable spot to book a place and stay this weekend?
I thinks it's more the short wave is coming in more and more amped leading to a stronger and slightly more north solutions.So, we're losing the length of time the 50 /50 is hanging around, and allowing our high to make a beeline stage right. That's why the low is driving inland.
It has nothing to do with the 50/50L really. It's the fact that the SW is stronger and stronger coming down.I thinks it's more the short wave is coming in more and more amped leading to a stronger and slightly more north solutions.
That 12z gfs was the earliest of a close off yet,that ive seen. Why it ssw back towards kansas. Just needed it to hold its hoarses another 6hrs.Basically, the energy is closing off sooner, slowing it down and thus allowing that to occur plus the more amped up solution more times than not trend poleward. I'm still not sold we don't see more ice, the HP getting a little stronger with a decent CAD setup, still plenty to sort out imho
Good to see quite a few members with the surface low along the gulf coast.View attachment 103798
These are increasing
This x 1000. Its great to close off deepen. Just do it a little latter.Good to see quite a few members with the surface low along the gulf coast.
I've seen comparisons like this a few times on here recently.. it is important not to compare an ensemble mean as a deterministic solution! The ensemble mean is NOT a forecast output and shouldn't be treated as one. Rather, there is usually clusters that ensemble members group into. It is much more useful to see how different clusters stack up over time, as ensemble means can be extraordinarily misleading.