Sheesh
It is weird to me that they have a whole tier of counties further southwest in the impact expected tier as opposed to the watch. I’m gonna bet it gets expanded tomorrow morning.
That's the more likely scenario IMO. I really do not trust any wrap-around snow/back side snow, unless there's a modeled legit deformation band.
Even when one is modeled, I feel like it hardly ever makes it over the mountains. I wish it would though!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Idk about that. In the December 2018 storm I had a solid 3 inches at the end of that storm from an ULL. They have potential in these kinds of storms
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Very interesting…..might explain why the snowfall totals for places like Chattanooga and Dalton weren’t even close for January 2nd stormevery weather model site has slightly different snowfall algorithms BUT the differences in outputs for the exact same model run are extraordinarily large. marginal thermals, mixing issues, etc really giving the algorithms a hard time
for example, the 18z GFS for here shows...
tropical tidbits: 2"
college of dupage: 8.4" (10:1), 4.7" (kuchera)
pivotal weather: 5.8"
weatherbell: 6.4"
buyer beware lol
I read his post around lunch today so he was going off of earlier runs, not 18Z...He’s saying the models are trending south and snowier, NAM, icon and GFS latest runs are North
We had that feature on the big 96 storm. Several inches out in front of the main show. ?For further clarification. It’s often under modeled and creates headaches when people try to get groceries the day before the storm. Why does this matter for the rest of us you ask? It can help build and lock that CAD in. View attachment 104957
Not really buying the back end snow in much of NC/SC outside the mountains. we need the upper level low further south for me to bite on the backend snow, DGZs are dried up while ptype maps are trying to show snow, I’m more intrigued by front end snow then I am back end snow atm View attachment 105137View attachment 105138
And the chances at front end snow are dwindling quicklyNot really buying the back end snow in much of NC/SC outside the mountains. we need the upper level low further south for me to bite on the backend snow, DGZs are dried up while ptype maps are trying to show snow, I’m more intrigued by front end snow then I am back end snow atm View attachment 105137View attachment 105138
I believe they are playing it conservative for now.Memphis was not impressed… yet