I don’t recall anything about the ICON being warm-biased like I’m reading some here? I don’t think that’s true? If anything, I’ve seen the opposite in the past at the surface.
Yeah, most everyone outside the mountains is going to change over to something other than snow with an onshore track. Really can’t have that.Not a great track through NC on the ICON. Still Yuck for lots of places.
Granted the ICON has been all over the place (along with the others) and will likely continue to play catch up with this thing, with its known 2m warm bias...the 12Z is quite the concerning look for the I-20 corridor in E GA/SC for what could be a significant ice event. Also kudos to all and the mods for the continued great discussion with this complex event.
It's been noted by a few people that it does tend to have a warm bias in the LR.I don’t recall anything about the ICON being warm-biased like I’m reading some here? I don’t think that’s true? If anything, I’ve seen the opposite in the past at the surface.
That's major ice for a huge chuck SC. My hope is we can trend even colder and and shear out the engery more and more, so we push the low pressure system towards northern Gulf, then more of us get snow/sleet and less areas with freezing rain. Basically wishcasting at this point,but just maybe we pull a Feb 2014 and avoid a very damnaging and historic ice storm.
Yeah a lot of that is ZR in the midlands. It fact the ZR would probably be even further south into the low country if the warm bias of the ICON is also taken into account.That's major ice for a huge chuck SC. My hope is we can trend even colder and and shear out the engery more and more, so we push the low presure system towards northern Gulf, then more of us get snow/sleet and less areas with freezing rain.
Freezing Rain is a self limiting process! Does the icon run warm!? GSP at 28 degrees
I also distinctly recall last winter in several CAD situations the consensus here was it had a COLD bias and that did verify. Different setup though, and maybe something has changed. IDK.I don’t recall anything about the ICON being warm-biased like I’m reading some here? I don’t think that’s true? If anything, I’ve seen the opposite in the past at the surface.
It's going to be hard to avoid this look unless we can find a model trend of faster, weaker to avoid the trailing wave coming in and really helping bias the pattern NWNot a great track through NC on the ICON. Still Yuck for lots of places.
ATL Mets aren’t backing off which is surprising. The strength of the CAD probably has a lot to do with that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Love the position of the low in south GAThat's an icy mess deep into SC
View attachment 104380