0% chance. Gonna agree with the met on the other board, over the years you realize they are junk maps.If that .50 comes to fruition for Charlotte, we would be looking at some issues...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RGEM in past winter storms has a bit of a cold bias. Also if temps are in the 31-32 range like the NAM shows with moderate to heavy zr the accrual rate will not be very good. ZR accumulates best when rates are light and/or temps are 30F or colder. If I remember correctly, the heavier rates of zr can also cause latent heating which warms the surface above freezing quicker vs a lighter rain.
0% chance. Gonna agree with the met on the other board, over the years you realize they are junk maps.
Brad P made a post about ZR being a self-limiting process. Heat leaves the water as it freezes and warms the air around it, so the heavier rates would heat the ground level up much faster than lighter ZR.RGEM in past winter storms has a bit of a cold bias. Also if temps are in the 31-32 range like the NAM shows with moderate to heavy zr the accrual rate will not be very good. ZR accumulates best when rates are light and/or temps are 30F or colder. If I remember correctly, the heavier rates of zr can also cause latent heating which warms the surface above freezing quicker vs a lighter rain.
This is correct but we aren’t looking at heavy rates with this system. Light to moderate is about the most you’ll likely get from this system.RGEM in past winter storms has a bit of a cold bias. Also if temps are in the 31-32 range like the NAM shows with moderate to heavy zr the accrual rate will not be very good. ZR accumulates best when rates are light and/or temps are 30F or colder. If I remember correctly, the heavier rates of zr can also cause latent heating which warms the surface above freezing quicker vs a lighter rain.
The lighter precip occurs near and prior to the onset of the event when global or even regional high res NWP models can’t and often don’t properly resolve it. Even when you consider sub cloud evaporation, I wouldn’t be surprised if freezing drizzle and/or light sleet started being observed in the Piedmont significantly earlier than forecast perhaps as early as midnight tomorrow night given the mid level warm advection and isentropic upglide that starts showing up by 4z. This underrepresented precipitation thru diabatic processes (mid level warming thru condensational deposition and low level evaporation) also would help “lock-in” the CAD dome ever so slightly sooner, potentially providing a few additional hours for low level cold advection to work its way down into the CarolinasBrad P made a post about ZR being a self-limiting process. Heat leaves the water as it freezes and warms the air around it, so the heavier rates would heat the ground level up much faster than lighter ZR.
To give it credit, there is a small chance of backside snow even for the piedmont I have been talking about. But that is over and beyond the realm of possibility.I thought they upgraded the RAP lmfao