• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry February 19-21, 2020 Winter Storm

NAM 12k has the 700-850 levels significantly colder than the NAM 3k in N AL. Can anyone shed light on which one is more reliable and why at this range?
 
Move this elsewhere if not thread appropriate, but broadly why do you think mets aren't focusing as much on this (and holding onto globals)?

Yes, most tv mets I've seen often go with the globals, especially the Euro and GFS for whatever reason. That's fine when 4+ days out but inside 2-3 days the meso models are usually better, especially with a warm nose. I remember years ago when the NAM was firing warning shots about a warm nose, globals didn't have it and NWS offices were forecasting large snow amounts for RDU to Greenville based on global output. It turned out the 3km NAM had the correct idea and the warm nose pushed all the way to the 85 corridor similar to what it modeled.
 
The ICON ticked south on this run. I definitely think the best chance for snow in general is probably SE of Raleigh even if this ends up way NW in the end
Do you think rates will be too light for Raleigh so that it primarily ends up as a light rain event despite snow falling farther southeast?
 
The RGEM is noticeably drier than the NAM at 48 hours (especially in TN). This, plus the ICON gives me pause at the moment.

rgem_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_48.png
 
The NWS has goofed for the last two small events in terms of Ptype. It has snowed with temps in the upper 30s and bottomed out down to 32 both times. I feel like they will miss the boat again. With that said, I don’t know how far the warm nose will make it up i77 but 99% of time it’s as far north as Iredell County NC which is a long county. Maybe the mix will stay near Mooresville but nothing really stopping it if precip rates bounce off and on. It will be a race to 1-3” for many IMO.
 
Probably running out of time for I-20 folks for this one. Probably a sharp gradient in extreme north GA and a nice event for the mountains.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Next 2 NAM runs will be critical and I think it is possible it will start correcting more towards the EURO. Problem for the SC, Ga, and ENC people will end up being temps and P-Type and for Northern NC and SVa will be moisture. As for the ICON, it has generally been a very poor model
 
Probably running out of time for I-20 folks for this one. Probably a sharp gradient in extreme north GA and a nice event for the mountains.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I-20 never had much of a chance . If you want to see snow out of this system you will need to head north


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
It's about a lot of things. I think Charlotte will be fine with the rates being shown.

View attachment 35200
One thing that could help out southeast portions of Charlotte metro (SE Mecklenburg and Union Counties) is the development of the coastal low can erode the warm nose quicker as winds aloft turn. Those portions of the metro have gotten in on the developing deform band a number of times with the 2010 Christmas storm being a good example
 
Next 2 NAM runs will be critical and I think it is possible it will start correcting more towards the EURO. Problem for the SC, Ga, and ENC people will end up being temps and P-Type and for Northern NC and SVa will be moistue.

Even though the GFS and Canadian have been trending towards the NAM?
 
Probably running out of time for I-20 folks for this one. Probably a sharp gradient in extreme north GA and a nice event for the mountains.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This will certainly be 85 north at this point. That’s just as far as delayed cold can make it with precip streaming through the area. The topography won’t allow it to build any further south until the bulk of precip has moved off to the east. It’s only about 105’ elevation difference between Downtown Greenville and areas in southern Greenville county. But man does it matter
 
Yes, most tv mets I've seen often go with the globals, especially the Euro and GFS for whatever reason. That's fine when 4+ days out but inside 2-3 days the meso models are usually better, especially with a warm nose. I remember years ago when the NAM was firing warning shots about a warm nose, globals didn't have it and NWS offices were forecasting large snow amounts for RDU to Greenville based on global output. It turned out the 3km NAM had the correct idea and the warm nose pushed all the way to the 85 corridor similar to what it modeled.

I remember that with the Jan 6-7, 2017 storm:
Preceding forecast discussion with 5-7 inches (when we ended up getting more like 1-2): https://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/wx/afos/p.php?pil=AFDRAH&e=201701060342

 
Local mets seem to be totally disregarding any other model and going with the Euro, even though the NAM has stayed consistent, and other models have trended to it.
 
Back
Top