NAM 12k has the 700-850 levels significantly colder than the NAM 3k in N AL. Can anyone shed light on which one is more reliable and why at this range?
Move this elsewhere if not thread appropriate, but broadly why do you think mets aren't focusing as much on this (and holding onto globals)?
NAM 12k has the 700-850 levels significantly colder than the NAM 3k in N AL. Can anyone shed light on which one is more reliable and why at this range?
Do you think rates will be too light for Raleigh so that it primarily ends up as a light rain event despite snow falling farther southeast?The ICON ticked south on this run. I definitely think the best chance for snow in general is probably SE of Raleigh even if this ends up way NW in the end
Probably running out of time for I-20 folks for this one. Probably a sharp gradient in extreme north GA and a nice event for the mountains.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
One thing that could help out southeast portions of Charlotte metro (SE Mecklenburg and Union Counties) is the development of the coastal low can erode the warm nose quicker as winds aloft turn. Those portions of the metro have gotten in on the developing deform band a number of times with the 2010 Christmas storm being a good exampleIt's about a lot of things. I think Charlotte will be fine with the rates being shown.
View attachment 35200
Next 2 NAM runs will be critical and I think it is possible it will start correcting more towards the EURO. Problem for the SC, Ga, and ENC people will end up being temps and P-Type and for Northern NC and SVa will be moistue.
This will certainly be 85 north at this point. That’s just as far as delayed cold can make it with precip streaming through the area. The topography won’t allow it to build any further south until the bulk of precip has moved off to the east. It’s only about 105’ elevation difference between Downtown Greenville and areas in southern Greenville county. But man does it matterProbably running out of time for I-20 folks for this one. Probably a sharp gradient in extreme north GA and a nice event for the mountains.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, most tv mets I've seen often go with the globals, especially the Euro and GFS for whatever reason. That's fine when 4+ days out but inside 2-3 days the meso models are usually better, especially with a warm nose. I remember years ago when the NAM was firing warning shots about a warm nose, globals didn't have it and NWS offices were forecasting large snow amounts for RDU to Greenville based on global output. It turned out the 3km NAM had the correct idea and the warm nose pushed all the way to the 85 corridor similar to what it modeled.