Nam is a good .5-.75 of precip as frozen/ freezing. Quick look at the soundings and they seem to say pretty big sleet event
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
One must think ... did the Fv3 catch something here... I think maybe if a storm can get through the 160 dark hour period where the Fv3 usually loses its fantasy storms ... than maybe those storms are legit
60 hour 12k nam is good. Now if it is the 3k 60 hour nam. That would be a little different.Not to be a Donny downer but lemme tell y’all a lil sumn bout that 60hr NAM...
Not to be a Donny downer but lemme tell y’all a lil sumn bout that 60hr NAM...
Not to be a Donny downer but lemme tell y’all a lil sumn bout that 60hr NAM...
If the NAM at 60 was right I would have about 3” of ice accrual in the past 2 months..optimism is ok. Just tread lightly60 hour 12k nam is good. Now if it is the 3k 60 hour nam. That would be a little different.
If the NAM at 60 was right I would have about 3” of ice accrual in the past 2 months..optimism is ok. Just tread lightly
Right. Why can’t we trade a SER for a Greenland ridge?To show how much potential this event had, if we get the solution the NAM is showing with this look at H5, that’s crazy, imagine what would happen without the SER, if I was outside of CAD zones, I’d be fuming View attachment 15888