• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Pattern Dazzling December

0z Euro at hour 240 and GFS at hour 240
57774c768e2fba61035e8e5b3dd9588e.jpg

f4a59213ae8f910a8f63708180adec12.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Although we've seen some changes for the worse on the models in the shorter-term (as I explained earlier yesterday), the overall evolution looks better as we get to the middle of December. Namely, the location of the blocking ridge to our north is a little more favorable for producing a coastal storm for the Carolinas, w/ the center of the +z500a being closer to the north shore of Labrador vs Baffin Island, as it was in earlier model forecasts.

North America NCEPR1 z500a NC Miller A Winter Storms (1948-2019).png

gfs-ensemble-all-avg-namer-z500_anom_5day-1192000.png

ecmwf-ensemble-avg-namer-z500_anom_5day-1321600.png
 
What a premature thing to do by accuweather.
5c06aef60b1f0b6b6d6880cc153d062e.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
more likely be right...
The SER firmly entrenched for the duration of the 06z gfs. This “models don’t know how to handle pattern changes” is harder to believe with each run.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
what pattern change ? Lol
 
Just woke up and skipped last nights runs, they weren’t that bad honestly, in fact seemingly sped up a little on modeling, change trickling back to around day 7-8, we’ve certain delayed the pattern, but even with the +PNA event last winter, it was seemingly rushed on NWP on to be pushed back, just common NWP issues, sucks that we’re not gonna get a major chunk of the TPV under the block initially but models are dialing in on cold seeping in from the Alaskan ridge. Not great runs, but not bad runs from the 00z EPS and 06z GEFS.9FA4C2C3-3EA8-4E90-856D-0220837FC1A0.png3AF51B2E-CAD5-40D7-8818-8135A25DC93F.pngF9A791BD-CE98-4495-9C94-447CF84DD3CD.pngDA7FCEC5-2925-4130-B832-8D2636CDAEC6.png95A3CACB-634F-43D3-A7AC-3007A193ADF0.png
 
Although we've seen some changes for the worse on the models in the shorter-term (as I explained earlier yesterday), the overall evolution looks better as we get to the middle of December. Namely, the location of the blocking ridge to our north is a little more favorable for producing a coastal storm for the Carolinas, w/ the center of the +z500a being closer to the north shore of Labrador vs Baffin Island, as it was in earlier model forecasts.

View attachment 124658

View attachment 124659

View attachment 124660
Do you think this is just going to keep getting pushed out? Or is it a matter of not if but when?
 
Just woke up and skipped last nights runs, they weren’t that bad honestly, in fact seemingly sped up a little on modeling, change trickling back to around day 7-8, we’ve certain delayed the pattern, but even with the +PNA event last winter, it was seemingly rushed on NWP on to be pushed back, just common NWP issues, sucks that we’re not gonna get a major chunk of the TPV under the block initially but models are dialing in on cold seeping in from the Alaskan ridge. Not great runs, but not bad runs from the 00z EPS and 06z GEFS.View attachment 124661View attachment 124662View attachment 124663View attachment 124664View attachment 124665
That’s a typical Niña look
 
Siberia already had the good chunk of the cold air. I was ok with my small chunk. But no, they wanted it all, and they got it all.View attachment 124670
I made a comment about this a few days ago when it looked like all of the cold air was going back upstream instead of downstream under the block. I thought it was just bad model physics. Another nail in the coffin for Bastardi’s bathtub sloshing theory.
 
Looking out to day 10, the latest GFS has lost the (great Lakes - transitioning to Hudson Bay) low. That helps establish the better pattern to pull cold air eastward. Side note: we don't tend to talk anymore about the Hudson Bay low effects on weather. I think it's because it gets set because of a -NAO. But nevertheless, seeing it is a good thing.

6z GFS at day 10:
1670076939238.png

0z GFS:
1670077045942.png

0z Euro:
1670077140956.png

Interested to see if it pops back up at 12z on the GFS and continues on the euro.
 
Looking out to day 10, the latest GFS has lost the (great Lakes - transitioning to Hudson Bay) low. That helps establish the better pattern to pull cold air eastward. Side note: we don't tend to talk anymore about the Hudson Bay low effects on weather. I think it's because it gets set because of a -NAO. But nevertheless, seeing it is a good thing.

6z GFS at day 10:
View attachment 124671

0z GFS:
View attachment 124672

0z Euro:
View attachment 124673

Interested to see if it pops back up at 12z on the GFS and continues on the euro.
I remember that the Hudson Bay low use to be a term you would hear all the time on the Weather Channel back in the 90s, but I honestly haven’t heard in there in years. It does a couple things… first a stronger low can help steer disturbances and pieces of energy around well to the south of it…the deeper the low, the further south it pushes the track. Also it can act as a cold air source as well. It being in place prevents Canada from getting flooded with mild Pacific air and allows for more in the way of homegrown cold air masses… this can be certainly be helpful the deeper we go into the month and closer to peak climo as you don’t necessarily need an airmass of Siberian origin to get winter storms in the south.. especially when there is strong blocking

Edit: for example both the January 1988 and February 2004 storms had a well established Hudson Bay low. Obviously those are two very different set ups, but it goes to show you that there are definitely different ways to get the job done when the Pacific is far from perfect.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top