starsfan68
Member
AO is negative. NAO is now negative.
AO is negative. NAO is now negative.
And you’re leaving out the most important thing for winter storms. The PNA is not positive.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Until we get more of a -epo and less of a -pna, we are chasing unicorns. Patience is required
I actually did a little bit deeper look into this on the ncsu.edu climate page, and for North Carolina at least, the -NAO is the most important teleconnection for winter storms. Months with an observed -NAO have a 25% increase in snow days. Now we’re obviously up against it if the PNA is much higher lower than -1 which is why we’re not going to get much help the next week. Something else interesting I found with regard to the PNA is that a +PNA has more of a positive impact on winter weather chances in El Niño years… this makes sense because often times periods of +PNA in a La Niña often lead to very suppressed storm tracks, fast flow, and very little moisture to work with.And you’re leaving out the most important thing for winter storms. The PNA is not positive.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It takes time sure. But changes started the 1st week in Dec and we were rolling by the 2nd week of December in 2010. So our top analog year for this -NAO clearly isn't going to follow the same progression. Maybe it finally gets there who knows
FYI - I believe they defined a snow day as any day where any monitor outside of the mountains in NC recorded 1” or more of snow. FWIW.I actually did a little bit deeper look into this on the ncsu.edu climate page, and for North Carolina at least, the -NAO is the most important teleconnection for winter storms. Months with an observed -NAO have a 25% increase in snow days. Now we’re obviously up against it if the PNA is much higher lower than -1 which is why we’re not going to get much help the next week. Something else interesting I found with regard to the PNA is that a +PNA has more of a positive impact on winter weather chances in El Niño years… this makes sense because often times periods of +PNA in a La Niña often lead to very suppressed storm tracks, fast flow, and very little moisture to work with.
It takes time sure. But changes started the 1st week in Dec and we were rolling by the 2nd week of December in 2010. So our top analog year for this -NAO clearly isn't going to follow the same progression. Maybe it finally gets there who knows
It takes time sure. But changes started the 1st week in Dec and we were rolling by the 2nd week of December in 2010. So our top analog year for this -NAO clearly isn't going to follow the same progression. Maybe it finally gets there who knows
Looking back, the initial block in 2010 moved into Greenland around Nov 20th. This time, it's Dec 5.....so, 15 days later. Of course, no 2 years are alikeSomething to keep in mind though is that we are looking at timing differences compared to 2010… back then the processes had started about two weeks earlier and if you remember, there was some very mild weather leading into Thanksgiving that year with some severe weather across the Deep South
Good point. Maybe we'll get there and be cold by the 20th and be solidly in a winter storm pattern by months end into the 1st half of January when climo is peakingSomething to keep in mind though is that we are looking at timing differences compared to 2010… back then the processes had started about two weeks earlier and if you remember, there was some very mild weather leading into Thanksgiving that year with some severe weather across the Deep South
Well dang, did yall see the new GFS run
Well dang, did yall see the new GFS run