Snowflowxxl
Member
Very good point. This will be one where we will have to follow the HRRR very closely to see just how far back to the west and northwest that occurs. During the January 2002 storm that was shown earlier, the models didn’t pick up on FGEN forcing until the short range models were coming into view…. while not receiving the amount that eastern CLT metro and points NE received, the northern Foothills and mountains still received a solid snowfall… I would expect something similar in this set upa jog to the NW is going to be expected as we get closer. Nothing is really holding it back from not going back NW some. Couple that with FGEN driven precip and global model bias of not picking up on it is making this threat look really nice for places that aren't in those 6"+ areas right now.
@Iceagewhereartthou see above. Globals don't pick up FGEN WAA generated precip. It is always more expansive and heavier than models can pick up on. This past weekend is a perfect example of that. Over running always has a more expansive precip field than what is modeled.I’ll ride to the cliff that this thing is coming NW. I’m going back and reading old threads for overrunning events and they all looked similar to this at this range.
1/28/14 at this time frame.
View attachment 107862
12/7/17
View attachment 107870
That one turned out to be a big bust in my area and went to the mountainsI’ll ride to the cliff that this thing is coming NW. I’m going back and reading old threads for overrunning events and they all looked similar to this at this range.
1/28/14 at this time frame.
View attachment 107862
12/7/17
View attachment 107870
I’m still on board. These are the kind of systems that often end up being big producers for our area at the 11th hour. ?
and there are some very good jet dynamics showing as well… all of that points to more expansive precip shield to the north and west@Iceagewhereartthou see above. Globals don't pick up FGEN WAA generated precip. It is always more expansive and heavier than models can pick up on. This past weekend is a perfect example of that. Over running always has a more expansive precip field than what is modeled.
I remember you used to live in Union County, so you know how frustrating these last few years have been down this way with being just on the wrong side of the line. I am cautiously optimistic that this will finally be a decent hit for this part of CLT metroGiven how are last system played out and how most seem to play out, especially at the last minute. I feel like if you’re sitting from N. GA to the Carolina’s- I’d be cautiously optimistic that there is a decent chance you’ll see something. And for the first time in a while, I’m really optimistic for those along and South of 85. Fingers crossed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’ll ride to the cliff that this thing is coming NW. I’m going back and reading old threads for overrunning events and they all looked similar to this at this range.
1/28/14 at this time frame.
View attachment 107862
12/7/17
View attachment 107870
Yea 1/28/14 is the closer scenario, but I needed two recent overrunning events as my “proof” ?This Friday deal does probably verify more amped than today's runs, that's been the trend this winter. But 12/9/17 was completely different. It had a big low instead of a 1040hp.
View attachment 107876View attachment 107877
it was definitely weird on Sunday snowing at 19 degrees. Roads were covered in 10 minutes of mod snow.snowing at this point and these are the 2m temps on the euro. just crazy.
View attachment 107878
Sorry I posted too soon lolI want to get excited but I'm scared too lol, the 12z eps thus far, maybe a smidge better
![]()
So this is 6 hours before that temp map? Sign me up.I want to get excited but I'm scared too lol, the 12z eps thus far, maybe a smidge better
![]()
I think you are in a really solid place even with nuance movements over next 48hrs on the models.Sorry I posted too soon lol
![]()
That normally seems to be the case. I'd be curious to see the next few frames of the mesoscale models.Gonna punt here. I think the moisture shield will come NW, but temps will be a big problem.
Is their a different p types or accumulation by it?
It looks like an almost even split between Miller A/B?
Actually more like a split between amped and flatter more suppressed, there really is nothing Miller B about this setupIt looks like an almost even split between Miller A/B?
It's looking very promising up that way Met, I hope you do well with this one. What's good for some may not be good for others but nothing we can do about it, If you miss with one just look for the next one. That's how we roll anyway!Sorry I posted too soon lol
![]()
Yeah, surface temps look amazing for this one. Going to be huge for us. Minimal accumulation lost to melting and the roads were get covered nearly immediately. Will make it a very high impact event even if the raw totals aren’t huge. 2” in these conditions will be higher impact on travel than 6-10” at 33F.The Euro has temps in the low 20s during this storm, damn.