Hypsometric
Member
With 15:1 ratios I guess we can afford a little less qpf
With 15:1 ratios I guess we can afford a little less qpf
I’m assuming since it get’s it’s boundary conditions from the GFS, it’s going to be similar to it so until the energy is sampled it may not differ much.Too early to see how nam is treating energy late in run?
Kiss of death over northern Texas lolI like this NAM run a lot more View attachment 106862
YES! SADLY SO!?That doesn't include today's does it??
I’m assuming since it get’s it’s boundary conditions from the GFS, it’s going to be similar to it so until the energy is sampled it may not differ much.
Either I have no clue what I’m talking about or the 18z GFS is about to be a lot better. 50/50 chance lol.The NAM is much better, much more in line with the big dog setups!
View attachment 106863
Well the energy in question comes into view around hour 60. Def worth looking atIt’s never to early to look at the NAM ???
Agreed. It looked better than the CMC!View attachment 106864This would have pulled a big dog had it continued.
Or both.The good news is we can win this one with a Miller A or with the very deep cold air, overrunning.
I would love a long term overrunning and then the second wave eject for a Miller A.Or both.
Wouldn’t have that for Huntsville? Hate to ask. Lol
I’m flying out of CLT tomorrow (hopefully) so I expect you’ll have this thing heading toward 85 & 40 by the time I get home next weekend!
Oh you know it would throw us a crazy run at some pointAnyone want to extrapolate the 18z RGEM? I sure miss the DGEX!
Interesting….
Thanks. Hoping so too. Already seeing cancellations for morning flights tomorrowThings were a mess today there and RDU. Hope you don’t get hamstrung by residual delays
Not quite as good as the 18z NAM, but definitely an improvement over the 12z RGEM and looks like it would produce something to me as the northern stream is digging and would probably capture at least part of that southern wave, though probably not the whole thing. IMO.Anyone want to extrapolate the 18z RGEM? I sure miss the DGEX!
Stronger short wave out in the pacific correlates to higher potential for an event…slp off NC coast.What does this mean in simpler terms lol? I’m still learning weather talk. Thanks
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s a 50/50 chance I would say.What's the chances this one could affect us further north and west,say northwest bama???
I’d that northern wave trends like the last one, we may not need the southern wave.Not quite as good as the 18z NAM, but definitely an improvement over the 12z RGEM and looks like it would produce something to me as the northern stream is digging and would probably capture at least part of that southern wave, though probably not the whole thing. IMO.
View attachment 106898
This is definitely another way to get there! If nothing else, if the northern wave starts digging more and can just capture a small portion of vorticity streamers from the southern wave, it would still net out about the same most likely.I’d that northern wave trends like the last one, we may not need the southern wave.
Agreed. While past events are over used as analogs, that is a digging northern wave from a 12/7/17 type solution.This is definitely another way to get there! If nothing else, if the northern wave starts digging more and can just capture a small portion of vorticity streamers from the southern wave, it would still net out about the same most likely.