The track of the Icon is about perfect if you want 4-6” from BHM to Huntsville. The 500mb low runs right down I20.If you take the icon track and the gfs surface temps western tenn and northern Miss get smoked
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The track of the Icon is about perfect if you want 4-6” from BHM to Huntsville. The 500mb low runs right down I20.If you take the icon track and the gfs surface temps western tenn and northern Miss get smoked
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I would bet considering it's just off on Temp profile and transfer the Ensembles will probably be really sweet actuallyYep, in the end, not much different....it was a little south, but had more amplitude on its eastern flank
Didn't it have problems with other CAD events?Why is the GFS so much more bleaker with dews /damming strength
Give it time. Hopefully it will ease about 100 miles south.lp still pretty far north on the gfs.
View attachment 104803
I don’t understand this track in the face of such strong CAD. It doesn’t make sense to me. Is that even possible? It might just be the weenie in me, but I don’t see how the CAD wouldn’t displace the surface low further S/E?Casual 998mb over Columbia
View attachment 104804
GFS resolution has never been good with CAD. Even with the upgrade it’s clearly still horridWhy is the GFS so much more bleaker with dews /damming strength
Ideally, I think most of us (outside the mountains) would like to see it a good 50-100 miles offshore of SAV instead of right onshore like that, but yeah it’s not too bad of a look, but definitely one that would changeover most of us eventually.
Yeah the backside event on this isn't too bad... 1-2 inches possible across AL/GA north of I-20Gonna be another backend snow for AL, GA
Ummm yeah……I’ll take this with no argument for Atl East and Northwards. Also….Dawgs may be skating down that Natty parade route?
And usually the Euro is usually better with these. GFS is just the GFS.GFS resolution has never been good with CAD. Even with the upgrade it’s clearly still horrid
So close to being something more. Just needed 1-2 degrees colder. But I definitely like the trend over like 3 runs.Yeah the backside event on this isn't too bad... 1-2 inches possible across AL/GA north of I-20
The one thing that gives it some credence is that the wave is strong and going negative tilt....that, and given this track here, it does make sense to run the sfc low inland of the coast even with the damming. But the GFS is stronger and farther west with the wave compared to others I believeI don’t understand this track in the face of such strong CAD. It doesn’t make sense to me. Is that even possible? It might just be the weenie in me, but I don’t see how the CAD wouldn’t displace the surface low further S/E?
Prbly a dumb question but does this take into account ratios lost to zr/ip or is this just liquid equivalent sn at 10:1
It's almost always the last to latch on to damming strength IMOWhy is the GFS so much more bleaker with dews /damming strength
Is this good.Center of the ULL now south of ATL on the ICON ?
![]()
Yikes this looks terrible for upstate Sc. Those totals stink.
Yes if you like snow.Is this good.