snowlover91
Member
shawn you think there's a flake in there for us?Be very careful with "simulated radar" it does not mean the precipitation isn't just virga. Using the total precipitation maps are best here.
oh forget ? I just asked then lolThis sucks for my area, although precipitation looks to be 0.10+, meh.. no flakes.
View attachment 17293
shawn you think there's a flake in there for us?
awesome maybe I'll drive to just west of Augusta lolThis is the best look the area has per GFS.. as you can see, no go even with some flakes way up there.. temps....
View attachment 17295
The warm Atlantic strikes again! Anyway, here’s the clown map for entertainment only (not buying it right now but gives up to 1” not far from @GeorgiaGirl by the way):View attachment 17289
awesome maybe I'll drive to just west of Augusta lol
@Jimmy Hypocracy NW trend and we've got drizzle!
We may not rip fat dendrites in central NC tomorrow morning but I still wouldn't be surprised to see some of the small "dandruff" flake type stuff around in the morning rush to mid morning time period.
why is everyone assuming 10 to 1? Not happening. Asheville NC to Charlotte Metro may see some snow showers in this setup
Mucho credit to the King and his ensemble if this ends up wetter as the 12Z models are suggesting. The King was already starting to see a wetter trend yesterday, which is way earlier than the GFS suite!
I think the 12km NAM also deserves credit, it picked up on a wetter solution as early as the 6z run on Sunday.
View attachment 17306
This is based off the KCAE airport area. These are not snow totals, just precipitation as a whole using 24 hour accumulation maps.
I am using Tropical Tidbits, as I have no raw data access to the majority of these models. I wanted to use the same method, the only difference is I will be using Weatherbell to get amounts from the Euro to update this post in a little while. Ranges like 0.20 - 0.30 are large differences, but I'm trying to be fair here due to larger gridding of the globals, which in turn won't resolve the miniscule details as well.
I will be updating this post with the GEFS/ECMWF/EPS later on and reposting it.
In summary, so far without Euro data:
The HRRR, 3KM NAM, and CMC are the lightest.
The GFS followed by ICON & FV3 & RGEM are heaviest.
The mean of all the models, so far using the higher tiers of totals noted below comes out to:
0.143 inches of precipitation.
KCAE Precipitation Accumulation:
12z ICON: 0.15 - 0.20
12z GFS: 0.20 - 0.30
12z FV3: 0.15 - 0.20 (has heavier amounts, but shifted to the West versus the GFS's location)
12z CMC: 0.05 or so (heavier precipiotation towards the South)
12z RGEM: 0.15 - 0.20 (the higher end is a tiny blip in Richland county and it has heavier axis South of the GFS and FV3 in the Augusta area)
12z NAM 3KM: 0.01 - 0.05 (random areas of 0.10+ to the South)
12z NAM 12KM: 0.05-0.10 (heavier just to the South with a large area of 0.20 or so)
12z HRRR: 0.05, maybe a tad more. (heavier precipitation to the North and South)
Very nice, this will be interesting to see how the 12z runs turn out vs what's modeled. Would you add in the UK, Euro, EPS, GEFS and RAP 12z runs as well so we can get a good comparison of all globals vs meso models?