-0.5Scared to ask but @SD?
Evapotranspiration is in high gear-0.5
.39 I'll take itScared to ask but @SD?
Was Global Warming around in 1925? If people are claiming the 116 in 2022 is caused by GW then I have to ask what caused the 114 in 1925?This could suckView attachment 121296
Probably dews in the 50s and 60s. I think most of us will take itCould we finally see an extended push of dry air across much of the south next week ? I sure hope so.
0.00" today, 0.14" yesterday, 0.15" MTD, 27.72" YTD. Absent some TC action we will finish the year well below avg.
Turn the rain check off. It sucks during the summer with localized storms.0.75 for the day, before the little Tempest man gets his hands on it. Not too shabby.
I think some versions don't have the option, but I agree.Turn the rain check off. It sucks during the summer with localized storms.
Just give it a few runs. Remember earlier discussions of now only (half) believing the models out to five days. A few days back I posted a GFS run showing the RDU area getting very little rain; how that changed.there aren't any temps in the 50s on the gfs out to 300+hrs wtf. awful.
Are the totals without rain check more accurate in general or during certain times of the year?Turn the rain check off. It sucks during the summer with localized storms.
Yes… if you remember a couple weeks ago, the GFS was showing triple digit heat for much of the Carolinas for this coming weekend.Posting GFS model runs will get you nowhere. There's suppose to be heatwave after heatwave in the extended that never materializes. Plus we are getting to the time of the year, where temps are going to start dropping even if we are above average. The pattern is really progressive anyways so you're likely going to see below average and above average temps all in the same week.
I honestly don't see the value of running the models past 7 days most of the time. In a really stable pattern, maybe there's some degree of accuracy, but in a really stable pattern, you could probably just extrapolate yourself and get the same solution. Obviously, local/sensible weather is going to be wildly inaccurate at that range.Yes… if you remember a couple weeks ago, the GFS was showing triple digit heat for much of the Carolinas for this coming weekend.
I certainly agree with not seeing the point in operational models past 7 days or so. Obviously I would still like to see Ensembles ran just to try and get a since of overall patternsI honestly don't see the value of running the models past 7 days most of the time. In a really stable pattern, maybe there's some degree of accuracy, but in a really stable pattern, you could probably just extrapolate yourself and get the same solution. Obviously, local/sensible weather is going to be wildly inaccurate at that range.
I generally like it during widespread rain events so I'll turn it on during the winter usually. I had a storm train over my house earlier this summer and drop well over 2.5". The rain man tried to cut that to like under .5" since it only rained in a small area. That's when I made the call.Are the totals without rain check more accurate in general or during certain times of the year?
By the way, the little man bumped me up to .88. I like that dude
I wonder where they are getting their information? Mine always gets cut.I generally like it during widespread rain events so I'll turn it on during the winter usually. I had a storm train over my house earlier this summer and drop well over 2.5". The rain man tried to cut that to like under .5" since it only rained in a small area. That's when I made the call.
I just assumed it was from NOAA and other tempest sites. Fine in some areas but I live in the middle of nowhere now so it wasn't cutting it.I wonder where they are getting their information? Mine always gets cut.
80 in Mid September is pretty warm for your area !Bring it!!?View attachment 121316
So are 50s for highs80 in Mid September is pretty warm for your area !
DewpointloverDan8780 in Mid September is pretty warm for your area !