TXTornado
Member
Thinking it'd be possible to chase two areas within a quick drive: Around Ennis, TX and in the RR Valley near Durant. Tight window though.
Looks like another active day across MS/LA.Spc’s wording is kinda strong
https://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/outlook/day3otlk.html
Stp is very high across the gulf coast, could see a strong tornado or two if a cell becomes semi-isolated. Damaging wind from a squall line or bow echo's also look plausible. PDS sounding from mobile county View attachment 19091
This sounding has lots of VBV, I’m not really decided on that subject as there’s some proof that it doesn’t do much but some proof that it can, IDK lol, but the nam 3km has very messy storms modes right here, more of a QLCS, still need watch for any storm that can manage to fire out ahead the line
Fwiw, this LR NAM sounding near Charlotte Friday night is just insane lol. Convection fires right underneath the surface low which tracks up the I-85 corridor leading to a very favorable environment for tornadoes. ???
Obviously long ways to go w/ this event and wind is most likely gonna end up being the primary threat but still if the surface low forms east of the mountains and backs the surface winds, then we could be in bad shape.
View attachment 19092
Yeah just looking at the nam sim reflectivity it has all kinds of things going on friday. Starts with a few shallow rotating cells early in the day with the S flow off the atlantic to a couple of isolated supercells in early to mid afternoon to the main show in the evening. Then Saturday looks like one of those days with scattered showers and a few thunderstorms around that produce a lot of small hailThis can’t be good.
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Already SPC has enhanced for Friday.... oh boy![]()
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Has the threat in Georgia diminished due to the arrival time over night?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We had better hope the 3km NAM is wrong with it's depictions of dewpoints in the upper 60s to 70 across the Carolinas and CAPE of 2,000-3,000 across most of the area in advance of the best dynamics or else there will be a nasty severe weather outbreak of wind and tornadoes. The SIM radar at hour 60 shows individual supercells popping up in the areas with solid instability and a line also appears to be forming a bit further to the west. This could easily be a scenario where supercells pop in front and then a line of strong winds moves through with the best dynamics and shear later in the afternoon/evening hours.
It's hard for me to buy the NAM's long range stability predictions. I have seen them bust high so many times. That said, the dynamic nature of the system and the wind energy upstairs raises the concern level. We'll have to see how things are looking from a completely overcast vs. broken sky standpoint as we near Friday. That will likely be the difference between spotty to numerous severe weather reports and a widespread outbreak.We had better hope the 3km NAM is wrong with it's depictions of dewpoints in the upper 60s to 70 across the Carolinas and CAPE of 2,000-3,000 across most of the area in advance of the best dynamics or else there will be a nasty severe weather outbreak of wind and tornadoes. The SIM radar at hour 60 shows individual supercells popping up in the areas with solid instability and a line also appears to be forming a bit further to the west. This could easily be a scenario where supercells pop in front and then a line of strong winds moves through with the best dynamics and shear later in the afternoon/evening hours.
CAPE at 18z Friday
View attachment 19108
SIM radar 18z Friday
View attachment 19107
But wont this be occurring tomorrow night for AL which would diminish the threat ?For now I would say so, the 3km NAM has the storms weakening quite a bit by the time they make it to Georgia... But with all the dynamics involved I would still watch this one as the line could hold together better than it's showing. It appears though the highest threats will be west and east of Georgia. The Carolinas and Louisiana/MS/AL look like the target areas right now.
But wont this be occurring tomorrow night for AL which would diminish the threat ?
It's hard for me to buy the NAM's long range stability predictions. I have seen them bust high so many times. That said, the dynamic nature of the system and the wind energy upstairs raises the concern level. We'll have to see how things are looking from a completely overcast vs. broken sky standpoint as we near Friday. That will likely be the difference between spotty to numerous severe weather reports and a widespread outbreak.
SPC write up had a interesting tid bit....
...Synopsis and Discussion...
Deep upper trough extending along the MS Valley early Friday morning
is expected to continue eastward, maturing into a well-formed
mid-latitude cyclone centered over the southern Appalachians by the
end of the period. Very strong flow aloft will exist throughout the
base of the upper trough, with the strongest flow developing within
its eastern periphery Friday afternoon and continuing into Saturday
morning. 500-mb flow could exceed 100 kt, which is near record
values across the Carolinas and into the mid-Atlantic based on SPC
sounding climatology. In contrast to these impressive dynamics,
overall thermodynamic environment will be marginal. Given that ample
low-level moisture will be in place (i.e. dewpoints in the mid 60s
to low 70s and 100-mb mean mixing ratios over 12 g/kg), the modest
instability is largely a result of warm temperatures aloft and
consequent poor lapse rates.
And they are banking on weak instability. If the instability turns out to be higher than they are thinking that will just add more fuel to the fire here.
Latest 3km NAM has a broken line segment and multiple individual cells across parts of GA and the Carolinas.
View attachment 19117
Soundings supports tornadoes all over central NC with sfc winds coming out of the SE, there is VBV in this sounding but I’m honestly ignoring it, this sounding anyways supports damaging winds with dry air aloft between 850 hPa and 500 hPa and decent PWAT which would allow for water loading, and plus that LLVL jet, this sounding anyways supports more low topped convection
View attachment 19118
It's amazing the NAM and GFS are always so different with their CAPE depictions. NAM seems to always be so much higher. I guess it's just the same as it is in winter...crappy.
Yeah, that's true. I'd probably lean closer to the GFS than the NAM. In this case, warmer air aloft and cloud cover should save us. The dynamics are going to be very good, and some decent wind should mix down. But I am still on the fence about a widespread, long-duration severe wind event. Heavy rain is almost certain, and I imagine even sub-severe winds will be able to more efficiently bring down trees, given the soil conditions.Normally in between happens, GFS underdoes CAPE sometimes by a 1000 jkg while the nam will spit out to much (500-1000jkg more than verification)
Beginning to worry a little about south MS/AL tommorow STP is extreme. And simulated radar shows supercells ahead of the line. View attachment 19122View attachment 19123