Z
I'll agree with this, if someone has an opposing well reasoned opinion than offer it, if this threat doesn't apply to your area or you have no analysis to provide then why come in here and troll it?Okay guys I like having the clown faces and all that stuff too. But continually just coming in here and spamming posts with them. Because you may not agree with something gets rather old. I'm putting my opinion out here on this setup. Yes probably isn't the most accurate always but doesn't mean it needs a clown or weinee for every post.
I'd like to throw out something as well with your comment. In the past 10 years my neighborhood has been hit by two ef3s in similar setups as this one higher shear low cape environments both l in late January Each event somebody was killed one down the street and another in a adjacent city. any tornado threat especially a ever changing winter setup requires all eyes.I can see where people's opinions can differ on severity of this system. But it only takes one hitting near you to make it a very bad day for you. So this is why I cover these storms like I do. Because they change on the drop of a pen sometimes; just how weather is. You can't be complacent on tornado risks.I'll agree with this, if someone has an opposing well reasoned opinion than offer it, if this threat doesn't apply to your area or you have no analysis to provide then why come in here and troll it?
The updraft helicity swaths are there.One thing I'm noticing here is a lack of updraft helicity swaths. Perhaps the better dynamic support lifting out?View attachment 113677