HSVweather
Member
Just a warning, the 3km NAM’s sim radar is absolutely horrendous vs reality.Nam 3km looks nasty like the HRRR. Look at all the low topped supercells. Which you can clearly see the classic supercell look on simulated radar as well. View attachment 113709View attachment 113710
Heres Birmingham AFD.View attachment 113711Huntsville afternoon AFD
Which weather models are better? Seems like most of the other cams are similar to the 3km nams idea but less isolated.Just a warning, the 3km NAM’s sim radar is absolutely horrendous vs reality.
Probably the ARW. Looking at wind fields I could definitely see a broken line of cells.Which weather models are better? Seems like most of the other cams are similar to the 3km nams idea but less isolated.
Very weak on UH though due to lack of instability and low lapse rates.Im afraid the ARW looks worse than all the other models lol. Those are some healthy supercells. View attachment 113713View attachment 113714
Yep. Hard to punch low level mesocyclones down with that, the one that gets going gets going thoVery weak on UH though due to lack of instability and low lapse rates.
Go with a mix of the HRRR and the ARW and you have a pretty good threat. More and likely instability is underdone. Probably going to reach near 1000j of sbcape. Those lapse rates though are near the threshold of 6.5 on the HRRR. going to have to check those lapse rates at 00z tonight before I go to bed and see what it looks like.Very weak on UH though due to lack of instability and low lapse rates.
Gut says with this type of setup, go with this area to see the highest shot at a damaging tornado.Yep. Hard to punch low level mesocyclones down with that, the one that gets going gets going tho
Jefferson County is already on an e-learning day tomorrow, so I lucked out for my kids on that.Anyone heard anything about schools and the NWS discussing early school closings tomorrow?
By home ish