Z
Zander98al
Guest
That for sunday???Got supercells?
View attachment 18732
That for sunday???Got supercells?
View attachment 18732
Too early to tell. Spc has a risk area defined for Georgia 5 days out so that's never a good sign.Is this a situation that would spare much of GA from a dangerous SVR threat? I don’t see much of a wedge forming on any of these models that typically spares I-20 & points north from bad storms, but for some reason,they always seem to fizzle a bit once they cross into GA from the West.
Full Disclosure: I’m more of a WinterWX guy than a SVR one, so I’m normally quick to trash the NAM because...well, reasons.
Got supercells?
View attachment 18732
yes sunday at 10amThat for sunday???
Is this a situation that would spare much of GA from a dangerous SVR threat? I don’t see much of a wedge forming on any of these models that typically spares I-20 & points north from bad storms, but for some reason,they always seem to fizzle a bit once they cross into GA from the West.
Full Disclosure: I’m more of a WinterWX guy than a SVR one, so I’m normally quick to trash the NAM because...well, reasons.
Goodness. Hate to see that off a global model. Which model is that the Gfs?yes sunday at 10am
EuroGoodness. Hate to see that off a global model. Which model is that the Gfs?
Got supercells?
View attachment 18732
Georgia will be getting into the action on Sunday, extent will be based on timing.Sorry for the weenie-esque nature, but is it reasonable to assume that these parameters would A) precede a frontal passage and B) if the answer to A is true, would these parameters advect east as well?
Sorry for the weenie-esque nature, but is it reasonable to assume that these parameters would A) precede a frontal passage and B) if the answer to A is true, would these parameters advect east as well?
Doesn't sound bad yet for GA.Georgia will be getting into the action on Sunday, extent will be based on timing.
GGEM slowed down the front even more. We end up getting smacked pretty good Sunday afternoon as a result.
That being said, the GFS sped things up a tad.
Yep, idk about CAPE parameters but the GGEM yo me looks like a trade off for more instability and less 0-6km shear, still is solid but slows down and has a weaker LW trough, still concerning, gfs is much stronger with the longwave trough so wind energy would likely be maxed out
View attachment 18733View attachment 18734
I just now noticed I put yo me instead of to me, lol, and yeah it would be similar to that system that gave Alabama several weaker tornadoes in the middle of March, but would definitely increase the large hail threatI''d take that trade off.
These soundings are extremely concerning, larger CAPE now and fairly saturated low levels likely mean Mesos scraping the ground combined with low LCLs, this is actually more concerning than the soundings I saw with outbreak that produced the lee county tornado, still it depends on early morning convection, how messy convection gets, cloud cover, but these soundings have EMLs with them, anyways these sounding support 2+ inch hail, 70mph winds and strong/long track tornadoes, we might possibly see a moderate risk if trends hold View attachment 18723View attachment 18724
Really depends on if things can stay discrete. With that meager EML, lack of cap and very strong SSW winds aloft almost parallel to the front I have my doubts.
In the past it seems to me areas far removed from where you would expect gets nailed by the early supercells in these types of setups. Id watch central MS early for the surprise.