• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry More SE Snow ? (1/16-1/18)

26903750_1548944805142265_2763390093470515993_n.jpg
 
Here is latest hrrr run. It has the band dying as it crosses through NW Alabama...have to watch to see if that trend continues as we move forward.

View attachment 3015
One reason it is dying out. Is because the hrrr only goes out to 18 hours. And so it not that reliable at that hour. I would trust it at 10 and under hours.
 
Here is latest hrrr run. It has the band dying as it crosses through NW Alabama...have to watch to see if that trend continues as we move forward.

View attachment 3015
The HRRR is good at times but even it is like most other models and best in it's "short range" not "long range", seriously I think it's great within 10 hours, sometimes beyond that it changes can be often and significant. Just something to think about.... wouldn't worry too much about it showing that at hr 18
 
Just a note, the NAM has nine hours of good returns over central AL on composite radar, yet doesn't print out much QPF or snowfall. I guess it is saying a small dry layer at the surface evaporates it. Keep an eye on that.
 
Does anyone think that 1/9-10/1962 MIGHT be an analog for this for ATL and RDU?

http://library.noaa.gov/Collections/Digital-Documents/US-Daily-Weather-Maps

Like now, the PNA, NAO, and AO were solidly + while the EPO was pretty neutral. ENSO was then cold neutral, which isn't too far off the current borderline weak/moderate La Nina. Like for this one, there was no Gulf surface low and there was a SW-NE oriented band of overrunning behind a very strong cold front though the surface high of 1/1962 was much stronger at 1060 mb vs the current one of only 1045 mb. Like for this one, surface winds at ATL were NW.
 
Why do CURRENT wx maps have a 1051 high over the N Plains when in reality it is only 1045? Also, all major models have been initializing off of a 1055-6 high as of 18Z when in fact it was then only 1047. Is this a concern as far as the accuracy of the models and, therefore, what would that portend for this wintry event? Wetter? Warmer? Anything?

SfcMap201801152300.gif
 
It's important to see how this performs to our west, because if it overperforms to the west, then I fell that could very well transpire to the east. Back in December when college station and places out in Texas racked in, it was a sign of what was to come later on.
 
Are you saying that would favor Roanoke Rapids to Norfolk VA?

A couple days ago I would have painted 3"+ potential from GSO to RIC, now it looks like Wake Forest to Emporia. There should be a band from CLT to GSO that may over-perform but at this point, Roanoke Rapids is in a very good spot if the upper levels continue to trend. We usually see systems trend away from us inside day 5, I am a big believer though in the 48-120hr dead period where guidance loses events just to bring them back in a slightly more amped version come verification. While this is by no means a rule, it seems to happen with some frequency and without a good explanation.
 
Back
Top