GFS is horribly dry and a dumpster fire.
ICON is definitely warmer than the other models. Maybe it's right? Who knows.It's odd, as the ICON is +9 on the GFS. The GFS would be workable (as in it'd go down in time) if there was precip and there isn't.
Gfs blows , it's always late. But yes it was an improved ruGFS tried to keep the line alive from earlier runs.
I don't think posting what it is showing is talking about it like it's the new Euro unless your talking about comments elsewhere or something....ICON being talked about like it's the new Euro.
Sent from my SM-J320VPP using Tapatalk
Massive qpf increase on ICON over last 3 runs
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
Yeah the GFS could certainly be right but lately it's just been horrible.... been more than one event it didn't show precip until verification time. It's not winningI was right about the GFS. Stubborn. I wouldn't buy much of it. The CMC took a step with the NAM and ICON. Let's see what the NAVGEM and Euro as well as the UKMET have.
is like what Euro was showing correct?That second band forming across south AL and GA is big.
I am a little concerned about boundary layer warmth even up hereWouldn't that be something... finally get the moisture then run into temp problems.
Yes the 0Z run had a line of snow developing in sw alabamais like what Euro was showing correct?
The icon has done no worse than the Canadian or gfs lately. It's also very similar to the euro and nam solution. Id roll with that is showing before the gfs honestly.ICON being talked about like it's the new Euro.
Sent from my SM-J320VPP using Tapatalk
Dew points recover well into the 20s ahead of this system it would be entirely possible we would have a deep enough layer of above freezing air near the surface we start as rain or mix before going to snow.We should fight that off with ease given the DP right?