Brent
Member
What on earth

I'm a few pages behind now but I was questioning earlier whether track 3 was plausible.This map was made from Scott from Weather Optics. I'm going with a path between 3 and 2 from his map.![]()
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
What on earth
![]()
Either the GRADS (model plot program) got wonked out or, the ensembles are all very much in agreement with a very strong system. I'll go with the later.What on earth
![]()
Promise?If those tracks are correct, Shetley and I , would never mention rain again!![]()
Yes indeed!Still a long way to go
Either the GRADS (model plot program) got wonked out or, the ensembles are all very much in agreement with a very strong system. I'll go with the later.
In fact, I'll ask Ryan and see.
If they're in that kind of agreement to generate an overlapping map like that in regards to position and strength, we have a big problem. Hopefully we'll have an answer soon.The gfs ensembles were very bad for florida as ominous as I've ever seen
The surface has 145 mph. The bad thing is that if Irma gets those in the upper levels that far out in the water, it could easily become a cat 5.So the hmon went all inyes that is 175 kt or about 200 mph at 850 mb
![]()
In about 2 hours or so we should have an answer indeed. Let's just hope it was a mess up. If not....If they're in that kind of agreement to generate an overlapping map like that in regards to position and strength, we have a big problem. Hopefully we'll have an answer soon.
In all seriousness, and not rhetorical, more ominous than Andrew, Charlie, Frances and/or Jeanne (just to name a few recent ones)?The gfs ensembles were very bad for florida as ominous as I've ever seen
Like ...Euro still favored, track a bit north.![]()
It did well with Harvey's strength, I believe? It was showing crazy strengthening for Harvey and most ignored it.So the hmon went all inyes that is 175 kt or about 200 mph at 850 mb
![]()
In all seriousness, and not rhetorical, more ominous than Andrew, Charlie, Frances and/or Jeanne (just to name a few recent ones)?
With you on the 8 days ...If they are correct a very large version of Andrew/Charley, both were small
Fortunately its 8 days out
I'm just not getting the FL connection (and believe me, I'm looking) ...![]()
Thanks, Brent (I think) ...This florida connection the ensembles never look like this![]()
Well. It's not a plotting error. Here is what the spaghetti plot shows at the same time:
![]()
I know I've said it several times but the size boggles my mind. Some of those have pressure sub-940 for a hundred miles. The area the winds would cause damage even inland would be incredible.
Trying to catch up with GEFSGFS still adjusting SW
I think you are forgetting Hugo for SC. That was much more recent than 1950. It has been a while for GA though.Did some quick research on when the last time FL, GA, SC and NC was effected by a Cat. 4 and 5 hurricanes.
In FL, the last cat. 4 was hurricane Charley from Aug. 13th, 2004. The last cat. 5 was hurricane Andrew on Aug. 24th, 1992.
Georgia's last major hurricane was an unnamed storm on Oct. 4th, 1898 that was a cat. 4.
NC & SC last major hurricane was, Hazel on Oct. 15th, 1954 as a cat 4.
As you can see, it's been awhile since these states have seen a powerful hurricane. The time may have come around, that it's time for another power hurricane to make it's round, and Irma may be added to the list. So, since it's been awhile, people should not be surprised by what the models have been showing for Irma.
Dang it, I did forget Hugo. But, Hugo occurred in 1989, so it's still been awhile for SC.I think you are forgetting Hugo for SC. That was much more recent than 1950. It has been a while for GA though.