Nerman
Member
There really isn't much sheer or dry air around it. We'll see...Sheer?
Last edited:
There really isn't much sheer or dry air around it. We'll see...Sheer?
Sheer?
Landfall is tonight?We will know tonight if they are correct.
WishcastingBased on…?
No. Maybe a true center to followLandfall is tonight?
lots of dry air in the GOM but should lessen soon.There really isn't much sheer or dry air at all around it. We'll see...
Definitely has that look to it. Looking at the outflow, this might end up with a fairly large wind fieldView attachment 151538
It's taking shape
Guess I'm missing how that translates if a model is going to be right on landfall pressure...No. Maybe a true center to follow
its called Analysis. We can go back on the models and see if they are correct on location, strength etc... Its how weather is understood. Doesn't mean its right but we can at least see if it initiated correctly.Guess I'm missing how that translates if a model is going to be right on landfall pressure...
I don’t think so. The 18Z suite is further east than the 12ZCone will come West at 5 pm if this is correct. View attachment 151532
The cone was too far east compared to other modeling, so the NHC will be adjusting which is why OFCI is pathed through the core of the models vs the GFS at 12Z. Suites may be east but the cone wasn't in line with the models anyway.I don’t think so. The 18Z suite is further east than the 12Z
I would say the analysis on whether models were correct on landfall location and strength would have to happen AFTER landfall, not tonight, when there may or may not even be a defined LLC, MLC, or ULC, let alone them being stacked. I'm glad you agree that whatever happens tonight doesn't mean a model is going to be right, like you had stated before. You have a history of getting really hyped about systems, and playing off the worst case scenario....I just want to make sure you understand that absolutely nothing about tonight will verify or validate anything in the future for this system. If it gets organized tonight, and that's a BIG IF, then all you can "analyze" is which models did better at initialization. What happens going forward is dependent upon many upper and lower level features that aren't even in play yet.its called Analysis. We can go back on the models and see if they are correct on location, strength etc... Its how weather is understood. Doesn't mean its right but we can at least see if it initiated correctly.
Is the NAM pretty accurate at 78 hours ?Headed for Panama City at 78 hours on the NAM at 985MB.
And this is why getting all horned up over these mega model runs right now isn't the best idea.The NAM at 63 is much weaker and is northwest. 32MB weaker in fact.