• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry January 8-9 Wintery Weather Potential!

Going by Kuchera I could see the Northern upstate getting 1-2" out of Fri system. Monday could be a Much bigger storm with more of the Board in play.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

What’s your thoughts on the no or little snow hole in Pickens and oconee counties? Gfs favors ne upstate while nam favors nw upstate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
What’s your thoughts on the no or little snow hole in Pickens and oconee counties? Gfs favors ne upstate while nam favors nw upstate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just have to wait till tomorrow and see if they come into Agreement. But in these type setups I would favor the NAM and RGEM. They are pretty could in these situations

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
What’s your thoughts on the no or little snow hole in Pickens and oconee counties? Gfs favors ne upstate while nam favors nw upstate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wouldn’t really say the Nam favors the nw upstate. That was the only model with that output. Honestly that would’ve been an upstate crush job had the wave not opened up at the last minute. The odds of that scenario happening is very very unlikely.
 
Here’s what I’m going with for now, note this is the chance of snow falling, I’m not gonna get burned by this one and say the chance of accumulating snow yet, but here’s what I think, the further NW/Towards mountains you go, the better chance of snow, I have that yellow circle because there’s a signal but plenty of uncertainty on a backside band feature, until the NAM bites, I don’t really reflect that View attachment 63231
Drop the blue line along the border from henderson along the blue ridge back to the smokies and its perfect!
 
Here’s what I’m going with for now, note this is the chance of snow falling, I’m not gonna get burned by this one and say the chance of accumulating snow yet, but here’s what I think, the further NW/Towards mountains you go, the better chance of snow, I have that yellow circle because there’s a signal but plenty of uncertainty on a backside band feature, until the NAM bites, I don’t really reflect that View attachment 63231
This is a pretty good map.. the only difference I would make is extending the 70-90% and 50-70% southward toward GA/SC boundaries to include macon, Jackson, Transylvania, and Henderson counties... those areas have pretty high elevation and tend to do pretty well with these types of systems.. NWS GSP also highlights these areas doing pretty well for this system; they actually have the highest snowfall totals here on their first take maps
 
Here’s what I’m going with for now, note this is the chance of snow falling, I’m not gonna get burned by this one and say the chance of accumulating snow yet, but here’s what I think, the further NW/Towards mountains you go, the better chance of snow, I have that yellow circle because there’s a signal but plenty of uncertainty on a backside band feature, until the NAM bites, I don’t really reflect that View attachment 63231

You gonna get burned if you keep putting the southern mountains in one of your lower percentage zones despite being the bullseye on nearly every model. Highlands about to make a believer outta you. ?

40EBE701-6F90-4848-8B81-6691354BCBB0.jpeg
 
This is a pretty good map.. the only difference I would make is extending the 70-90% and 50-70% southward toward GA/SC boundaries to include macon, Jackson, Transylvania, and Henderson counties... those areas have pretty high elevation and tend to do pretty well with these types of systems.. NWS GSP also highlights these areas doing pretty well for this system; they actually have the highest snowfall totals here on their first take maps
Yea I agree, mistake on my part
 
Back
Top