• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry January 8-9 Wintery Weather Potential!

I don't really care for Sref plumes at all but they're up to 2.5" here which was a big increase from the previous run and is usually telling for the upcoming nam.
 
Looks like GSP's first call is outView attachment 63136
That looks spot on to me with current guidance. I'm very hesitant to say accumulating snow down to 85. I can see flakes flying there but not accumulating. I would have discounted the long range NAM and figured it would fold by tomorrow. But thats hard to do with the Euro in its camp. So let's see where this goes.
 
What a disaster, that leaves a sour taste, looks like we need the ULL further north to generate precip in the first place ?View attachment 63164
I don't think our area has been dryslotted for the past three years. It will be interesting to see if it fills in on subsequent runs. I can see this having an area of drizzle to the north with a swath of snow further south where there are better dynamics.
 
Looks like we need a stronger upper level low, and one that remains closed off if we want it to be that far south, deeper the ULL = the colder the air is aloft and the more forcing you get
 
The track was perfect. Just south of columbia by about 20 miles. The moisture just literally disappeared

this wrecking ball dive bombs a bit further west into upstate NY instead of Maine and shreds the circulation much sooner than prior runs. I think SD mentioned that as a possible concern yesterday

1609879570180.png
 
The nam does this in the long range no need to panic .. we always see the Nam fill in as we get closer .. 3km is also going to be interesting to watch the next couple days
I have to cautiously agree. I have seen plenty of NAM runs look anemic compared to globals. Even the two snows I've had this year the long range nam was anemic.

Doesn't mean this storm WILL come in wetter but atleast this solution falls into the NAMs known biases
 
The NAM still pretty for the upstate at least


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
It’s a combination of things that effect this run, 1. it’s that piece of energy in Canada 2. also the upstream shortwave digging a bit more around Colorado which collapses the ridge and has a response by allowing a weaker ULL, this is something I alluded to a few days ago as those little shortwaves have thrown things complete out of balance with systems this winter 98A64C96-0B85-4F67-ADCD-D215D6FBD343.gif
 
The NAM still pretty for the upstate at least


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It’s not very often you see western upstate looking good. This will change again and again


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I do a lot of lurking these days. Just my .02. The EURO and EPS family have consistently been the leaders for this threat. The EURO has consistently shown the general same idea for the last 5 runs now. The 12km NAM has supported that same idea once or twice in the long range.

If I were to hang my hat on a model for this ULL even I'd have to say I'd lean to the EURO for this one. Although we sometimes see the Euro and gfs "meet in the middle" as I like to say. But the new GFS supporting the EURO is further evidence in its favor. And now the OP GFS is also close to the EURO.

No need to panic over a long range NAM run. We have overwhelming evidence of a fairly widespread winter event.

In fact, I think I would rather have the NAM fail us in the long range then go bonkers lol.
 
Using the NAM out towards the end of its range is somewhat of a fool’s bargain, anyways. It’s great with temp profiles closer in, though of course.

Would I be noting this if we had gotten a good ‘ole fashioned Happy Hour NAMing? Probably not. ?
 
The GFS is going the same things the NAM is, but i think the NAM is definitely underdoing precipitation stillC9C03A1C-896D-4523-849A-BB59D3D011CD.gif
 
The differences here is laughable at hour 48, you have a strung out piece of upper level energy bar salt closed off on the NAM at this hour vs a closed off low on the ICON which is better 2FE42D61-010C-4600-9CDD-3182046DE371.png9F154DD0-FE36-460E-B80C-26120F0B3D15.png
 
RGEM is solid
sn10_acc.us_ma.png
 
By Wed. I will have to buy the NAM. Until then, lets hope it improves. Not sure I could even counter-argue with the GFS/NAM tag team. I mean, they aren't the Road Warriors or Rock N Roll Express, but they are better than the Bushwackers.
 
Back
Top