iGRXY
Member
I was about to ask.... How reliable is the ICON? It's moreso a rhetorical question.folks its the icon
Right where we want it at this stage, I reckon.Good lord
View attachment 164547
let me put it this way to how i view it; it's invited to the wedding but it's not a groomsmanI was about to ask.... How reliable is the ICON? It's moreso a rhetorical question.
The icon is only talked about as much as it is because people are impatient for the GFS to come out and the ICON is something to look at in the 30 minutes prior.let me put it this way to how i view it; it's invited to the wedding but it's not a groomsman
It's a warm up act. We can clap or not so much if the main event is going to be solid.The icon is only talked about as much as it is because people are impatient for the GFS to come out and the ICON is something to look at in the 30 minutes prior.
Supposedly it's great with physics so it would be nice to have it get to reality so we can get a picture of how it would handle a phase.I was about to ask.... How reliable is the ICON? It's moreso a rhetorical question.
If I remember correctly, the storm track really didn’t trend NW the last couple days. It was more a deal where 36 hours out, the short term models started to recognize that the moisture was going to be much more expansive to the NW. I remember that because my NWS point forecast went from the afternoon update on 2/9 with a chance of flurries to the morning update on 2/10 a WAA for 1-2” to the late morning update an upgrade to WSW for 2-4”. I ended up with 5.2”. There was still significant snow with that all the way down to Mobile.The 2/12/10 storm had an anomalous -AO/-NAO setup. The airmass was quite cold, but early next week's airmass is progged to be much colder than that. (Cross polar flow connection sourced from Siberia).
Couple things also to note is just how prolonged cold it's been really since December 2024. Nearshore SST's along the Gulf and the SE Atlantic Coasts are way below normal. I would tend to think that also would tend to force the baroclinic zone further offshore (western Wall of the Gulf Stream would be the natural battleground).
I would lend to think that a Central FL to offshore possibly similar to the Feb 2010 event is probably the most likely outcome.
don't want to come across as diminishing it too much, it's a real model and it's nice when it's part of the consensus but it showing an unfavorable solution is not a death knell to meSupposedly it's great with physics so it would be nice to have it get to reality so we can get a picture of how it would handle a phase.
Exactly, the track and at that time, the EURO when it was nicknamed the King for a reason never wavered off a Central FL crossing. Only adjustments I needed to make was for a northward expansion of the precip shield and increase amounts in the Midlands and inland costal counties. I did analog searching and couldn't find one single match at that time due to the anomalous pattern. That was a fun stormIf I remember correctly, the storm track really didn’t trend NW the last couple days. It was more a deal where 36 hours out, the short term models started to recognize that the moisture was going to be much more expansive to the NW. I remember that because my NWS point forecast went from the afternoon update on 2/9 with a chance of flurries to the morning update on 2/10 a WAA for 1-2” to the late morning update an upgrade to WSW for 2-4”. I ended up with 5.2”. There was still significant snow with that all the way down to Mobile.
4 days is a ton in terms of model adjustments (good or bad)
Sort of stunned to see the CMC leading the way here, GFS folding to it??