View attachment 163993
Maybe this stupid piece of garbage will be right this time
not super concerned about the gfs, especially if the ensembles are fine, but this holdout is a bit curious to me
It is hard to believe that the best and brightest America can put forth would be this completely lostnot super concerned about the gfs, especially if the ensembles are fine, but this holdout is a bit curious to me
I'm pretty certain that bias WebberWeather noticed on how it handles cold air on the Rockies is partly to blame here. I mean that run had the jet stream well east of the Rockies that go around ...not super concerned about the gfs, especially if the ensembles are fine, but this holdout is a bit curious to me
Inside 180 hours too.. someone is about to take on a huge error on their record and it clearly feels like the GFSIt is hard to believe that the best and brightest America can put forth would be this completely lost
Right? lol
Not curious to me anymore. Par for the course. Never expect anything diff from it. Learned years agonot super concerned about the gfs, especially if the ensembles are fine, but this holdout is a bit curious to me
And the panhandle and extreme South GeorgiaMembers are already showing up in TX on monday
It would be a blessing and welcomed . Snow,not frzng rain partCMC is an absolute nightmare for the SE. round after round of winter precip of significant portions. This will shut down the SE for a while if it were to play out that way
webb is elite at finding little nudges like this, helps his operational forecasting is in NM hereI'm pretty certain that bias WebberWeather noticed on how it handles cold air on the Rockies is partly to blame here. I mean that run had the jet stream well east of the Rockies that go around ...
it is still a fine enough weather model that will have accurate and inaccurate periods. while i'm skeptical of the holdout the solution is in the back of my mindNot curious to me anymore. Par for the course. Never expect anything diff from it. Learned years ago
It would be a absolute dream for me and I have to get out and work in it. We had this stuff happen in the 80s and 90s and we're still hear to talk about it.CMC is an absolute nightmare for the SE. round after round of winter precip of significant portions. This will shut down the SE for a while if it were to play out that way
More amp system like your saying. Still curious why gfs is in goofy land?!?!GEFS looks like Canadian Op.
I'm starting to wonder if part of the reason the CMC is picking up on the storm despite wildly different H5 solutions is because it often does a better job of recognizing cold air masses and the baroclinicty associated with them. The GFS does not look correct with this and is probably one reason it is missing out on the isentropic upglide associated with this event. This is just a theory, but you can see below during the heart of the Canadian event what a difference there is.The Canadian has been steadfast in showing a big winter storm. I suspect this is because the pattern isn't as complicated as some of the more typical conditions we often see with these things.
Yep, I don't disagree. That makes sense.I'm starting to wonder if part of the reason the CMC is picking up on the storm despite wildly different H5 solutions is because it often does a better job of recognizing cold air masses and the baroclinicty associated with them. The GFS does not look correct with this and is probably one reason it is missing out on the isentropic upglide associated with this event. This is just a theory, but you can see below during the heart of the Canadian event what a difference there is.
View attachment 163998View attachment 163999
Not a nightmare at all…. That’s a dream
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And that the GFS develops a Lee side Rockies Low in Colorado spuriously and flooded Texas and OK with strong southerly flow...I'm starting to wonder if part of the reason the CMC is picking up on the storm despite wildly different H5 solutions is because it often does a better job of recognizing cold air masses and the baroclinicty associated with them. The GFS does not look correct with this and is probably one reason it is missing out on the isentropic upglide associated with this event. This is just a theory, but you can see below during the heart of the Canadian event what a difference there is.
View attachment 163998View attachment 163999