Mahomeless
Member
It's been jumping around a bit more than I would have expected based on its performance with the last storm.....it's not locked in yetcan anyone comment on if this model is beginning to get consistent on this? it is seared into my mind how this model locked in on the last storm around this range and generally held that look in a chokehold until verification
It's been pretty consistent the last 4-5 runs with the large scale features, imo. (just undulating with the strength of the wave and how much it's rooted in to the main trough). (But it's showing signs of settling in, imo)can anyone comment on if this model is beginning to get consistent on this? it is seared into my mind how this model locked in on the last storm around this range and generally held that look in a chokehold until verification
Makes sense....considering 15% of model data is pointing that way....Kbmx going with 60 percent chance of suppression
Not 60% chance of suppression, but 60% chance of no low forming at all?? So they're saying 60% to GFS vs 40% for ECMWF/EPS/AIFS/ICON/CMC/CMCE/UKMET/MOGREPs ??? Doesn't make much sense to me.Kbmx going with 60 percent chance of suppression
What 2018? Seems like RDU set a record for consecutive hours below freezing during that epic January freezeOn the EPS for RDU it doesn't get above freezing from 0z Monday until Thursday afternoon...I don't think I've ever seen that here.
View attachment 163850
I would in that area too....they cant broadcast anything wintry down that far until 36hrs out when its 100% known. If theres ANY possibility it could go nothing id hug that like crazy tooNot 60% chance of suppression, but 60% chance of no low forming at all?? So they're saying 60% to GFS vs 40% for ECMWF/EPS/AIFS/ICON/CMC/CMCE/UKMET/MOGREPs ??? Doesn't make much sense to me.
36 hours out is ANYTHING BUT 100% known.I would in that area too....they cant broadcast anything wintry down that far until 36hrs out when its 100% known. If theres ANY possibility it could go nothing id hug that like crazy too
There needs to be something that kicks the wave in the SW east - either an upstream kicker wave that arrives from the NW or movement of the NE Pacific ridge east (or combo of the 2)
Maybe I'm jaded or not very smart (probably both) but that loop that 1300 shared a few post back of the Euro ENS H5 height/vorticity map was a little concerning to me. Didn't like the look of the pac ridge trying to pinch off/roll over the top (wave break?), allowing that SW to continue to push westThere needs to be something that kicks the wave in the SW east - either an upstream kicker wave that arrives from the NW or movement of the NE Pacific ridge east (or combo of the 2)
My grandma remembered that storm. She was an 11 year old girl on a farm in Louisiana near the MS/LA line back then. She told us how she had been so excited at first to see snow, but that the cold that followed for the next several days meant the snow stuck, so she hated having to deal with it for so long. That was her first time seeing snow too.would love to know more about Jan 1940
You need to hydrate & report back then.You guys are absolutely insane for trying to nail
Specifics down right now. We have a huge signal. LFG. I don’t have the energy anymore to model watch.
It's a concern, yes, and don't want that trend to continue more and more.....but nice to see other modeling / other EPS members producing a good storm into the cold.Maybe I'm jaded or not very smart (probably both) but that loop that 1300 shared a few post back of the Euro ENS H5 height/vorticity map was a little concerning to me. Didn't like the look of the pac ridge trying to pinch off/roll over the top (wave break?), allowing that SW to continue to push west
I need a Time Machine. Getting older now….You need to hydrate & report back then.
It’s murky, the more we do it, the pac derived wave gets stuck, but then we start playing with the northern stream digging more and probably get a cleaner solution, don’t wanna go into the in between route thoughIt's a concern, yes, and don't want that trend to continue more and more.....but nice to see other modeling / other EPS members producing a good storm into the cold.
I would prefer to kick it out into long fetch SW flow overrunning, then sharpen it just a touch as it moves east (not too much and keep it cold out front)It’s murky, the more we do it, the pac derived wave gets stuck, but then we start playing with the northern stream digging more and probably get a cleaner solution, don’t wanna go into the in between route though
That was issued before the good runsWPC Day 7 surface map. Low over central Florida. 1036 mb + High over the Virginia
View attachment 163870
Is there a huge difference between B'ham and Huntsville?View attachment 163854
Another increase in members with snowfall on the 12z eps.
It’s gonna be an I 85 south and east classic storm.Man the eps for Charlotte is a beauty.
View attachment 163859
Is there a huge difference between B'ham and Huntsville?
Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk