SnowwxAtl
Member
What are they seeing that we don't see?Hard to totally let it go when the NWS predominant weather maps look like this from 1pm Tuesday til 1am Wednesday. Sometimes it just wants to snow View attachment 165571
What are they seeing that we don't see?Hard to totally let it go when the NWS predominant weather maps look like this from 1pm Tuesday til 1am Wednesday. Sometimes it just wants to snow View attachment 165571
It's suppressed. Great for some but further north nahhLet’s see the hrrr
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah I was just noticing the slight slowing and extending west of the northern piece while southern piece is touch stronger, completely separated from Baja low influence. Let's see if this translates to any improvement at the surface
This is trending in the right direction for sure.Yeah I was just noticing the slight slowing and extending west of the northern piece while southern piece is touch stronger, completely separated from Baja low influence. Let's see if this translates to any improvement at the surface
Baby steps
View attachment 165576
The surface low tries to pop in virtually the same place at 12z.Really thinking this run translates to help get QPF further west in SC and NC...still a coastal plain special but more lift and energy to blossom precip shield
Pushes our surface low and moisture too far south. Just too much press if there’s not going to be a phase.
It's a double-edge sword. It trends south but the axis is improving. I think I would take a further south start point if the axis can shift better unless I'm mistaken.NAM with a consistent southward trend, esp 18z.
View attachment 165581
There is definitely something to the orientation thing. You can see how it keeps flipping back in forth on all models. It'll look more zonal some runs then go back more towards a SW to NE.It's a double-edge sword. It trends south but the axis is improving. I think I would take a further south start point if the axis can shift better unless I'm mistaken.
Totally agree with this, thinking it can get us a better SW flow aloftIt's a double-edge sword. It trends south but the axis is improving. I think I would take a further south start point if the axis can shift better unless I'm mistaken.
Yeah the low is south but if axis and direction of low doest kick NE at 48 would never get moisture actually northIt's a double-edge sword. It trends south but the axis is improving. I think I would take a further south start point if the axis can shift better unless I'm mistaken.
Are we really trying to pop another low? Lol
Look at how the entire orientation of the moisture shifts on the NAM.
View attachment 165584