• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry January 21-23 2025

How did the GRAF do for our area for the January 10 storm? I do know it was one of the few that showed the precipitation starting earlier than the other forecast. As I didn’t understand why schools still didn’t go to elearning the night before when it kept showing sleet starting during the time of the early dismissal.
 
NWS forecast just updated. First forecast below. Having a hard time believing Atlanta gets more snow than Columbia. But who knows.
View attachment 165424
Given where model guidance is at this point I agree, but if we’re going to entertain the scenario of higher snowfall ratios up here w/ little precipitation I don’t think it’s that unlikely. My main concern would be virga even if we also entertain the scenario of a last second NW trend. I remember a weak disturbance swept through here back in early December 2010 and was nothing but a wall of white on radar w/ nothing but a couple flakes flying here and there. As always with any winter storm of any scenario we always introduce another problem while fixing another. If we didn’t luck out on the January 10th storm the way we did, I would be more pissed about this one ngl only because it is a much better setup on paper, but I can’t even be mad. We got our fair share, if we get whiffed to our south I ain’t mad at it. I’m hoping all the snow lovers on this board get their turn one way or another.
 
How did the GRAF do for our area for the January 10 storm? I do know it was one of the few that showed the precipitation starting earlier than the other forecast. As I didn’t understand why schools still didn’t go to elearning the night before when it kept showing sleet starting during the time of the early dismissal.

I'd say it did decent tbh. It was one model showing the possibility of a bout of snow when I was saying no, naaahhhh.

It's just tough to buy here even if it looks similar to at least one short range model I've seen.
 
Take it as you will but the NAM looks a touch better so far. There's less interaction with the pacific low and I really think nothing is going to be dead set on the energy until it's cleared. The window is narrowing however.

I am usually not that great at reading the 500mb side of the models but I felt that it had less interaction at 06z from 00z as well. Hopefully we can keep that trend up from here on out and get that northern stream to help us out. At least what does fall will accumulate quickly for us. Just need to squeeze out every bit of liquid that we can.
 
Take it as you will but the NAM looks a touch better so far. There's less interaction with the pacific low and I really think nothing is going to be dead set on the energy until it's cleared. The window is narrowing however.
Well slight adjustments along with models probably under doing extent of precip shield NW, they struggle with fgen we've seen, and yeah not far off from a nice NW jump of the sn footprint
 
I'm probably being dumb but it sorta looks like the NAM is going for it with hooking them up here? It's at least a big improvement and should have the precip shield more robust i'd think.

View attachment 165457
it will still be left behind but the trend with the southern energy is refreshing to say the least. northern stream isn't getting the memo but should be some marginal improvements upstream for this run
 
How did the GRAF do for our area for the January 10 storm? I do know it was one of the few that showed the precipitation starting earlier than the other forecast. As I didn’t understand why schools still didn’t go to elearning the night before when it kept showing sleet starting during the time of the early dismissal.
I think it did pretty good with it. If you ask Bonds, I think he would concur...
 
Back
Top