• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry January 21-23 2025

I must be missing something. 18z NAM and 18z GFS looked opposite regarding depth of the energy out west & interaction with the pacific LP, but output very similarly at the surface. Looking at h5, you'd expect the outcomes to be very different.
 
Learning here… What exactly makes this better? is it better in terms of more precip and a wider storm?
it’s didn’t really make much of a difference in particular on this run. But ideally you’d like to see the northern stream not outrunning the wave as much as it has been in recent runs. This run started better but looks like we ended up losing the northern stream a bit quicker so it was basically a wash in the end. If you can get that interaction to be more naturally north/south tilted like the Canadian was doing yesterday. You get a lot of precip.

18z GFS
IMG_2685.png

12Z Canadian yesterday (sadly this seems out of reach now)

IMG_2684.png
 
976b07fabbfd2baa5cd547f3cbbbc7c4.png

Good snow totals coming off the RGEM for the southeast but in my opinion it may be overdoing it some


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The interaction between our big vortex and the western Ridge is what’s going to make or break us. At this point it’s still very much undetermined. We don’t want our northern stream digging west as the Euro and NAM showed today. We want it to dig southwest and grab the wave diving south, pulling it out of there just before getting squashed by the collapsing ridge that’s falling down the jet stream. We have a little over 24 hours before that interaction takes place. We’ll see what happens.

Latest GFS also showing the trough digging too deep, hanging back, and getting squashed by the jet.
IMG_1485.pngIMG_1486.jpeg
 
Eh, it'd be nice if the ULL got scooped up, but it's not really necessary (would be to score big though).

It'd be better if the wave dropping out of Canada missed interaction at this point. The Euro showed a way to score that way.

Anyway, the GEFS seems a bit more suppressed.
 
SUPER EASY to understand for all…. He says what some others have…. Easiest way to get this further NW is to sacrifice the HP to a degree. Like it’s that simple …. Kind of. Also “NW trend is only gospel to STRONG LP’s…. This is around 1015 … that’s not strong enough to wrap up and bend backwards NW that’s why it’s sliding or staying South, SE”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Keep in mind that "Polar/Artic" highs do tend to "flatten out" more when they spread deep into SE... Bill Harms longtime MIC for KATL office explained that at an AMS meeting I attended back in early 80's
 
Reason why gfs sucked is because while the northern stream digged more, regionally the whole height field was further suppressed
Nice catch. GEFS followed same gameplan. H5 looked significantly better but heights in the south got suppressed like a lowering tide. Enough to really shut off lift and shunt qpf south. Despite the disappointing result… really something to keep an eye on if this is the start of a trend reversal
 
Seems like a slightly important Euro coming up. Just slightly

100% it improves …. Just to Laugh at us, but in all seriousness, if it did hold especially improve … you gotta wonder just what in the Heck happened on GFS. I mean , Trending worse …. Sure. Losing the storm completely has to be a glitch or something


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Man when this thing comes roaring back tomorrow it’s going to be epic.
I want some of what your having... definitely been a crap overall day maybe 00z runs will turn frowns upside down and this epic cold and systen just being hard to model because we sorta been all over place in models for past 3-4 days
 
Euro pretty consistent except for that 00z run last night where I made a fool of myself. Just to be clear on where I stand, I think we can still see a northwest adjustment absolutely. In fact, I think it's probably going to happen. But as @packfan98 said, our ceiling has lowered significantly most likely, unless we can somehow back the trough axis up. There's still time to do it, but not much (to increase our ceiling).
ecmwf-deterministic-namer-total_snow_10to1-1737223200-1737536400-1737536400-20.gif
 
Back
Top