• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry January 21-23 2025

It sucks to be right on the edge of something historic and just miss by a few hours. The two Xs need to merge, like the NAM kind of gets to here.

View attachment 165068

This whole area is a powelder keg. We just need to figure out how to get it to ignite.

View attachment 165069
Yep that’s the frustrating part RC is that this is so close. The I85 and south group just don’t get many opportunities with this kind of cold air out front
 
If the northern stream of energy would just slow down a bit so the southern energy would catch up we would be watching a bomb go off over the Deep South and the Southeast coast. I wish the southern low were just a bit further north so there would be a chance for interaction if the northern energy would slow down.
 
So for a semi newby in this stuff. It seems like west central Georgia has been a hotspot for this one for a while. Does the NW trend need to be a concern for us, or is this looking like the 50 year event type deal right now. I won’t ask any more clutter questions.
Think you will be fine with temperatures for snow there, but just have to see how much precipitation can work in
 
I'm rooting for the RGEM/CMC. I just don't want to give up on my snow hope on account of the NAM, which stands practically alone against the other models. Also sometimes the NAM has overdone WAA for severe weather events around here. But it's a reliable short range model, so I can't completely shake it.
 
I'm rooting for the RGEM/CMC. I just don't want to give up on my snow hope on account of the NAM, which stands practically alone against the other models. Also sometimes the NAM has overdone WAA for severe weather events around here. But it's a reliable short range model, so I can't completely shake it.

As much as I would love for the NAM to be right for my area, since it wants to phase and truly overamp, I wouldn’t worry too much about it if I were you.

Now if it was just farther NW, I would be concerned.
 
Ive seen a lot of comments on this already floating around, but I wouldn’t dig too much into things like ratios with this storm just yet.

A lot of other things besides temperatures dictate snow liquid ratios. Many folks may also have to contend with sleet.
First, appreciate all that you contribute to the forum, Webb. Any idea when you might put out your first call map?
 
Key is what happens when our diving energy and that pacific ULL do. If they stay separate and trend that way, we will see more of an amped solution and more inland moisture. If they touch it's a touch of death and we will see no snow north of 20.
 
Reminder the gfs trends from 84hr for the northeast storm, not sure why people are cliff diving based on it
View attachment 165081
Yeah just like it wouldn't take too many bad trends to lose this one almost entirely, it wouldn't take too many good ones to get ppl in the game. I just don't think you can fully punt until monday or so 🤷‍♂️
 
Changes so far on the 12z cycle aren't good. CMC is less amped, GFS much worse, ICON about the same. Still time for things to change the other direction but it is going to be harder to get that to happen since the key pieces are only 48 hours out from interaction with one another.
 
Back
Top