This looks much better in terms of a possible connection than the GFS from earler.
This looks much better in terms of a possible connection than the GFS from earler.
I doubt it’ll make a leap that much in 1 run but the orientation thru 72 is wayyyyy betterI don’t want to jump the gun here but the UK might go for it this run
i don't think the southern wave is going to catch up in time, but should be a reassuring runI doubt it’ll make a leap that much in 1 run but the orientation thru 72 is wayyyyy better
If the CMC continues to stick to its guns, and this is an epic fail for it, it either needs to be totally revamped or totally retired! Because you could not trust it for anything at that point ?! doesn’t matter how far out, how close in, you just couldn’t trust it…so why would you keep putting the same product out there?It’s getting spooky. Really getting the CMC look to it
Tbh it may not show it at the surface but I’m starting to feel like we may not need the perfect H5 look. The CMC really does just enough early on to get the lift needed for overrunning and the Arctic airmass to pretty much do what they do. The same could be said here with this run even if we don’t necessarily get the surface reflection. Just a thoughti don't think the southern wave is going to catch up in time, but should be a reassuring run
coming around to this, perfect h5 look would be a ton of fun thoughTbh it may not show it at the surface but I’m starting to feel like we may not need the perfect H5 look. The CMC really does just enough early on to get the lift needed for overrunning and the Arctic airmass to pretty much do what they do. The same could be said here with this run even if we don’t necessarily get the surface reflection. Just a thought
It was clearly headed for glory because it’s froze now. They had to stop it just like they stop the lottery sometimes when they need to “fix” it.Tbh it may not show it at the surface but I’m starting to feel like we may not need the perfect H5 look. The CMC really does just enough early on to get the lift needed for overrunning and the Arctic airmass to pretty much do what they do. The same could be said here with this run even if we don’t necessarily get the surface reflection. Just a thought
The perfect H5 look gets you something the euro was spitting out a few days ago. And honestly you need it for these globals outside of the CMC to get the surface reflection to show it because they simply have a history of under performing with overrunning and WAA generated precip. But if we just get the lift and get the jet screaming SW to NE like every model has shown you’re pretty much set in getting a solid precip shield that should put down some solid totals and especially ratios. Over a larger area than being depicted.coming around to this, perfect h5 look would be a ton of fun though
Yeah the CMC is not relying on some specific H5 look. It has shown about 5 different looks at H5 yet still resulted in similar snowfall output - I believe it is more about the intense Arctic air mass and surface level processes including isentropic upglide / frontogenesis forcing. I posted this earlier but had a mistake so I removed it. The CMC has been oscillating a lot at H5 but producing similar footprints of snow. Why? It has to be those surface features like I mentioned. That's the one thing it has remained (fairly) consistent with.Tbh it may not show it at the surface but I’m starting to feel like we may not need the perfect H5 look. The CMC really does just enough early on to get the lift needed for overrunning and the Arctic airmass to pretty much do what they do. The same could be said here with this run even if we don’t necessarily get the surface reflection. Just a thought
Yeah the CMC is not relying on some specific H5 look. It has shown about 5 different looks at H5 yet still resulted in similar snowfall output - I believe it is more about the intense Arctic air mass and surface level processes including isentropic upglide / frontogenesis forcing. I posted this earlier but had a mistake so I removed it. The CMC has been oscillating a lot at H5 but producing similar footprints of snow. Why? It has to be those surface features like I mentioned. That's the one thing it has remained (fairly) consistent with.
View attachment 164879View attachment 164880
View attachment 164882
See I see it opposite. This airmass is legit. If this was your typical marginal airmass, then yeah I could see your point but it’s not. Also the GFS is really bad with these types of overrunning FGEN driven setups. To me the only reason the CMC seems realistic is because we know how cold this airmass is likely to be.View attachment 164885
For comparison’s sake, the gfs trend. It’s just not as cold. Gives me even more pause about the cmc given its cold notoriety
It's almost assuredly too cold, it always is. I'm just trying to figure out why it continues to output this snowfall footprint despite wildly varying H5 evolutions.View attachment 164885
For comparison’s sake, the gfs trend. It’s just not as cold. Gives me even more pause about the cmc given its cold notoriety
I wonder if it’s a combo of what you and Ross said tbh. Too cold inland produces more overrunning, right? Combine that with consistently stronger/consolidated trough you get a bangIt's almost assuredly too cold, it always is. I'm just trying to figure out why it continues to output this snowfall footprint despite wildly varying H5 evolutions.
I think our points are related TBH. Stronger overrunning initially over TX may be leading to some of the downstream effects. It's definitely a combo of factors, it's not just one thing that's for sure. Will be interesting to see what the RGEM and NAM do with this.I wonder if it’s a combo of what you and Ross said tbh. Too cold inland produces more overrunning, right? Combine that with consistently stronger/consolidated trough you get a bang
add the euro to the list that is more improved early on with the N/S, but this is where the wheels have been falling off going forwardUmmm. so far that wave around ND/SD getting held back way more. Everything in general is further west View attachment 164889
Ummm. so far that wave around ND/SD getting held back way more. Everything in general is further west
Yep, we need the n/s coming in over the Dakotas instead of WisconsinUmmm. so far that wave around ND/SD getting held back way more. Everything in general is further west View attachment 164889