• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry January 21-23 2025

I’m just starting to not see how we get a better closer phased look at this lead time we’re at. It would take major adjustments on most modeling. I could see how The overall overrunning could be better then advertised especially if the northern stream press backs off some off the SE and the pac based digging vort is better tilted. thats more of a possibility to me. But phasing to a bomb ? Idk
 
View attachment 164837
That is not my favorite! How did it still kinda work!
Have no idea, there isn't even much of a SW flow aloft for moisture transport this far north. Shows you how bad the GFS can be imho, seems to just spit out what it wants regardless of synoptics
 
The previous storm didn't involve a lot of physic processes that this one does, so it's kind of mute on which was better, besides for thermal profiles, imo.
 
I’m just starting to not see how we get a better closer phased look at this lead time we’re at. It would take major adjustments on most modeling. I could see how The overall overrunning could be better then advertised especially if the northern stream press backs off some off the SE and the pac based digging vort is better tilted. thats more of a possibility to me. But phasing to a bomb ? Idk
still some time but likely need to see some meaningful trends with modeling start now
View attachment 164839

Everything is better lolololol
not sure if i'm a fan of the lower heights out west trend, we'll see
 
You've just gotta laugh involving the CMC.

I'll be more interested when the RGEM gets closer to in range, but this has to be just badly wrong like how it was too late on the first system of interest in January.
 
What models were most accurate in this time frame for the previous storm?
I'll be honest, this question has been asked numerous times over the last couple of days and it's not as simple as model xyz did good last time so it will this time. Different models handle different setups differently better or worse, sometimes one model is good, next time it isn't. Overall verification scores still say pay close attention to the Euro but even that's had it's issues at times. Let's just see how all this plays out
 
I just have a hard time believing somehow the CMC is worlds better than the GFS/ECMWF and their ensembles.

CMC seems to be the most out to lunch vs the GFS. Regardless, it’s going to be extremely embarrassing for one of these models. My bet is the CMC is off.

Still think this is a solid winter storm for the coastal regions. More ice south with the warming upper levels. 1-2 inches for inland areas around Raleigh maybe less towards the foothills. Sweet spot for snow will be the outerbanks region of NC.

Hope somehow things can trend bigger for the whole group but inland areas still have much time to score in the winter.
 
I just have a hard time believing somehow the CMC is worlds better than the GFS/ECMWF and their ensembles.

CMC seems to be the most out to lunch vs the GFS. Regardless, it’s going to be extremely embarrassing for one of these models. My bet is the CMC is off.

Still think this is a solid winter storm for the coastal regions. More ice south with the warming upper levels. 1-2 inches for inland areas around Raleigh maybe less towards the foothills. Sweet spot for snow will be the outerbanks region of NC.

Hope somehow things can trend bigger for the whole group but inland areas still have much time to score in the winter.

I bunch of the Euro and GFS ensembles show what the CMC just ran....
 
7 straight. It’s gonna get crucified (rightly) when this doesn’t happen
View attachment 164854

That or either the rest of our models are absolute crap. This has got to be bad or good data somewhere causing this. The crazy uncle has never did this at day ten much less just over four days out.
 
Back
Top