L
Very well could, if we get northern stream energy further ahead of it/stronger around the GL, could be a nice storm, plenty of time to trend either directions, euro was solid but it weakened the energy near the GL, but the CMC looked really good with thatI can’t wait to see what cmc does with this tonight. And the euro the track is near perfect maybe we trend colder
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That’s almost exactly how we need that N/S trough to look with the second system, or like the CanadianLet's give the GFS the benefit of the doubt and stop right here. This will do nicely.
View attachment 61872
Remember what I said , can’t play with fire and not get burned . Need to smell the 70 and sunshine before you can get the 32 and snow . It can be 70 and sunny and never get cold and snowy but it can never be cold without there being warm . Well 1977 but that was dry as hell and frigid , then the month after was really warm and hit 81. So I guess my rule still works .Of course when we get a legit arctic dump, we know where this is headed.... that NPAC/-EPO block = -PNA = southeast ridge View attachment 61868View attachment 61869
Yeah the gfs was about as bad as you can get if you want snow. Need something more similar to the euro/Canadian to have a shot. I mean it essentially is a split flow across NOAM at that point so we are probably going to see a few wild variations over the next few days. Wouldn't be at all surprised to get a wound up cutter and an overrunning event on the models as they try to resolve the wave interactionsVery well could, if we get northern stream energy further ahead of it/stronger around the GL, could be a nice storm, plenty of time to trend either directions, euro was solid but it weakened the energy near the GL, but the CMC looked really good with that
Looks good for Brent.V16 throwing a bone for y’all west of the mountains View attachment 61876View attachment 61877View attachment 61878View attachment 61879
Miller A setups like what we may see a lot of in the coming month or two are much more tenuous imo than CAD or overrunning and are typically boom/bust type events with very limited predictability beyond day 4-6. Point is, going forward thru January & even February, don't get discouraged if you aren't seeing fantasy long-range snowstorms on ensemble guidance or operational NWP. These kinds of storms often sneak up on you at the very last minute (think Jan 2000, Dec 2010 for ex (although we've made some improvements since then)).
Cross polar ridge?Lol ridge from the west coast to Russia View attachment 61871
Interesting seeing GEFS pull ridge off the west coast. If that continues and we block it could be like Jan 2011.
View attachment 61883View attachment 61885
Now you’re speaking my language!Interesting seeing GEFS pull ridge off the west coast. If that continues and we block it could be like Jan 2011.
View attachment 61883View attachment 61885
That’s almost exactly how we need that N/S trough to look with the second system, or like the Canadian
I know that as of recent, the MJO is much slower, and I'm far from an expert on tropical forcing, but these is the probabilities:Random -- do you know if MJO phase is uniformly distributed (e.g. is Phase 1 equally likely to Phase 6?)?
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/2016GL071423#:~:text=The climatological percentage probability for,predictions of a strong MJO.The climatological percentage probability for each of the eight MJO phases is around 8% (~33% of the time the MJO is in its weak state), and thus, the green/blue color scale also indicates probabilities greater than climatol- ogy for predictions of a strong MJO.
Interesting seeing GEFS pull ridge off the west coast. If that continues and we block it could be like Jan 2011.
View attachment 61883View attachment 61885
I know that as of recent, the MJO is much slower, and I'm far from an expert on tropical forcing, but these is the probabilities:
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/2016GL071423#:~:text=The climatological percentage probability for,predictions of a strong MJO.