But if they didn't produce snow in the past then why would they be great patterns?
It doesn't have to be a historic storm. Just ssying if a pattern is called great for producing snow around here then it should be one that we have seen in the past that more times than not did produce. I don't think it would be a pattern that was called great if that wasn't the case.
It's considered great because it's a remembered or composited pattern that produced snow here and they generally share common traits. What isn't remembered or compiled is how many times historically we had similar patterns that didn't work. That leads to a misconseption that these patterns always produce and if they don't we don't know what works anymore.
We live in a location that might on average have a general less than 10% chance of seeing snow on any winter day. If you have patterns that increase those odds to 33-50-70 I would consider that great but there's still a fail percentage. It's like having your best free throw shooter who hits 80% at the line in an end of game situation. History says there's a good chance they make it but statically they may miss.
We need a “ you just got served “ emojiCan’t cut much with a suppressive 50/50, maybe a little bit but not much View attachment 64725
If only it were Jan........?In other words, ho-hum.
I’m getting real sick of this --- View attachment 64754
Sup.
The two ridges, one in the NATL and NW need to be much stronger before we consider January 2018 as an analog.Lol this is similar to Jan 2018 if we get this further south at H5 View attachment 64773
If I remember correctly that 2018 storm snow in ms al western ga and nc and skip sc were it rain the whole time until at night where it finally changed over to snow where Greenville sc got like 4-5 inches or was that the year before that one when that one happenedWow this is really close to that setup, dig it a little more/tilt it to hold back moisture and there you go View attachment 64776View attachment 64777View attachment 64778View attachment 64779