Storm5 link said:[quote author=Rain Cold link=topic=60.msg3529#msg3529 date=1482794376]
[quote author=Jon link=topic=60.msg3518#msg3518 date=1482793589]
[quote author=Rain Cold link=topic=60.msg3505#msg3505 date=1482792239]
[quote author=Rain Cold link=topic=60.msg3504#msg3504 date=1482792066]
[quote author=Tarheel1 link=topic=60.msg3501#msg3501 date=1482790369]
Bless their heart on the other forum! It's like a dysfunctional family over there!
It really gets nuts when crazy uncle Mack shows up!
[/quote]
I'm still trying to figure out why this D10 cold pattern is so much more credible than the usual D10+ cold patterns we see winter after winter that either don't pan out or greatly moderate by D0. But the only evidence that anyone has been able to show so far is the latest couple of D10 runs.
[/quote]
Blocking.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[/quote]
It's hard to put to much stock in 10 day modeled blocking, which will likely end up being the 3rd false start of the season.
[/quote]
based on what?
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
[/quote]
I base it on the following:
1) Seasonal tendency for a -PNA
2) Seasonal tendency for a +NAO
3) Seasonal tendency for a SER
4) Annual, recurring tendency of models to overdo blocking and the subsequent cold push in the LR
5) Several false starts at blocking so far this season
6) Unfavorable background state
I'd stack those chips up against an 8-10 day model prog any day of the week.
But don't get me wrong, I hope it's right this time. But until it works into shorter leads, the wise course is to be skeptical, IMO.