• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Pattern Jan 2025 Powered by Rheem AC

I am concerned about the high feeding the cold air from Ontario, it would make me much more comfortable to be 1036-1038 instead of 1032. Not saying it can not work but we have seen so many highs progged to be 1040 and ends up being 1028-30 at go time. Still, good to see a chance and something to follow at least
 
MichaelJ said:
I am concerned about the high feeding the cold air from Ontario, it would make me much more comfortable to be 1036-1038 instead of 1032. Not saying it can not work but we have seen so many highs progged to be 1040 and ends up being 1028-30 at go time. Still, good to see a chance and something to follow at least
Click to expand...
We just had a 1050 HP in the NE with 41/39 and rain a week or so ago lol. What really matters is the amount of cold air that comes with the high, not necessarily the high strength
 
Myfrotho704_ said:
We just had a 1050 HP in the NE with 41/39 and rain a week or so ago lol. What really matters is the amount of cold air that comes with the high, not necessarily the high strength
Click to expand...
Exactly. Especially if there’s a strong snowpack in place across southeast Canada and the northeast. For example, the 2004 storm only had a 1030mb high
 
Arcc said:
Dangerous words, FWIW.

That mean and OP isn’t far apart.
Click to expand...
The +PNA is vastly different on all of the ensembles relative to the 18Z GFS operational run. The 18Z run introduced an SW into the PAC NW muting heights there. No doubt there are similar members but the mean disagrees. IMHO.
 
Myfrotho704_ said:
AI dropping out west at 18z. Maybe some of these runs with the NPJ retracting to much should be considered a possibility
Click to expand...
Difficult to say for sure, but given the propensity for west cold dumps the past several winters, I wouldn't discount the possibility.
 
Improvement on the GEFS in trend loops for Jan 3. Also, notice how the center of attention weather wise across the world (in NHemi) is over North America

aJlczrw.gif

6HZLCo8.gif
 
Last edited:
Rain Cold said:
Difficult to say for sure, but given the propensity for west cold dumps the past several winters, I wouldn't discount the possibility.
Click to expand...
The Pac Jet is so fickle. It lives rent free in our heads unfortunately (me included). But this kind of reminds me of jumping in and out of the market. The day you jump in, you start worrying if the market is going to crash. The day you get out, you start worrying about getting back in before the next climb.

The going tendency so far this winter is for the Pac Jet to be a little stronger than expected. Here in late December, we are going thru a period in which the Pac Jet is going to be at its farthest east (1st image), and it results in this nasty, Gulf of AK Low / SE Canadian ridge / Super El Nino look. From there, it begins to retract. The things that would encourage the Pac Jet to retract strongly back to the west would be: 1) the MJO moving boldly into the E Indian Ocean and the Maritime Continent (Phase 3-4-5) - we shouldn't be seeing that until maybe mid-Jan, and / or 2) A strong -EAsiaMtn Torque event - things look mixed to me over Asia over the next 15 days - I don't see a strong signal for a big plus or neg torque event. But I used the word encourage because while we try to attribute the movement of the Pac Jet to certain things, it can be very difficult to predict with the natural variability of the atmosphere having its way as well.

Dec 22 Pac Jet Ext.png

Dec 22 GOAK.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top