• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Pattern Jammin' January

Oh yes he does. He's a good meteorologist in Louisville. Jeez, can't post anything on here without someone complaining.

He is saying it goes off the charts negative. The only thing that does is the Control, the EPS mean is around -2. The Control is wildly inaccurate.

Its not complaining, just clarity.
 
Sign me up
8765736bd6cf85d042e3da8e701cb78d.jpg


Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
now that right there...to me....says heads up for GOM surface low potential.
 
Actually on that map....the control goes off the chart...the mean, is not, but it's deeply negative.

Yeah, its still great no doubt. That said it would be the same as posting the QPF chart with precip behind the 0C line and saying its snow, when not noting that the QPF measured fell 6 hours before the temp reached 0C. We rail on JB, Cohen and Spann, so we need to point out this inaccurate statement.
 
Yeah, its still great no doubt. That said it would be the same as posting the QPF chart with precip behind the 0C line and saying its snow, when not noting that the QPF measured fell 6 hours before the temp reached 0C. We rail on JB, Cohen and Spann, so we need to point out this inaccurate statement.
agreed, the met that said that was clearly wrong..I agree
 
Saw this on Twitter a few minutes ago:
View attachment 11283

Yeah definitely still an outlier. But interesting to see.
This is very similar to some of those snowier gefs members posted earlier.

64EE62F5-A9F6-4E22-8627-995F9CB56FDF.gif

End of run. Notice separation between the energy (red color between them) this is very different from OP models.

F0B97249-20E2-4BAB-A0DE-9387F3E7FB18.png

It is the nam at 84. But nam did ok at range with the recent ice event I think.
 
Well, it is the NAM, I don't trust it that much in this range...BUT......check out this trend of the last 4 runs of the doc....check out what is starting to show up in the northern branch and between the northern and southern branch...something to potentially watch as we go through the next few days......
ecmwf_z500a_us_fh96_trend.gif
 
Well, it is the NAM, I don't trust it that much in this range...BUT......check out this trend of the last 4 runs of the doc....check out what is starting to show up in the northern branch and between the northern and southern branch...something to potentially watch as we go through the next few days......
View attachment 11293

This is the first system around the 20th correct?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Well, it is the NAM, I don't trust it that much in this range...BUT......check out this trend of the last 4 runs of the doc....check out what is starting to show up in the northern branch and between the northern and southern branch...something to potentially watch as we go through the next few days......
View attachment 11293
Ridge is much taller on the last frame! That’ll get it in the right direction!
 
Well I was thinking the West Atlantic Ridge but it looks like it’s gone by 234. So nothing
Just was wondering. The 500mb flow doesn't look too suppressed or have such a steep gradient that it shears waves out. If anything most pieces are in line at that time frame for the goods

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
Just was wondering. The 500mb flow doesn't look too suppressed or have such a steep gradient that it shears waves out. If anything most pieces are in line at that time frame for the goods

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Yeah it’s certainly not a cutter look so that’s a start
 
last 24 hours of GFS (5 runs worth) some pretty good changes. Now, I DO think most of us see all rain from weekend storm, BUT I am ok with that...I would like to see this get as strong as it can and help us for the next wave next week..... The other point is, and MANY have said this already today...and every day....the models are still ALL over the place...
gfs_z500_vort_us_fh84_trend.gif
 
HP behind the first system on the 19th and 20th isn't as strong or as south driving as the last few runs on the 0z gfs
 
The GFS lol...couple days of runs where the HP on Sunday at 12z is consistently centered over eastern South Dakota, now the 0z run its 500 miles northeast in western Ontario. That why it not as cold Sunday/Monday down here. With that big of a shift, I would trust NOTHING the GFS shows.
 
He is saying it goes off the charts negative. The only thing that does is the Control, the EPS mean is around -2. The Control is wildly inaccurate.

Its not complaining, just clarity.
It’s Insanity!! All hell is about to break loose! It’s sad that we have to one-up the next person with extreme dramatic tweets and hyperbolic descriptions of things. Why can’t it just be that the ensembles are showing a very cold and potentially stormy pattern setting up? In the end, that’s far more likely to turn out closer to reality than insanity and mayhem!!!11!1
 
Back
Top