-
Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!
He is saying it goes off the charts negative. The only thing that does is the Control, the EPS mean is around -2. The Control is wildly inaccurate.
Its not complaining, just clarity.
Really? Has this turned into crap like this now? I posted about weather. I hope some of this gets deleted. It has no place in here.
Actually on that map....the control goes off the chart...the mean, is not, but it's deeply negative.
now that right there...to me....says heads up for GOM surface low potential.Sign me up
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Yeah, its still great no doubt. That said it would be the same as posting the QPF chart with precip behind the 0C line and saying its snow, when not noting that the QPF measured fell 6 hours before the temp reached 0C. We rail on JB, Cohen and Spann, so we need to point out this inaccurate statement.
Yeah definitely still an outlier. But interesting to see.
This is very similar to some of those snowier gefs members posted earlier.
End of run. Notice separation between the energy (red color between them) this is very different from OP models.
It is the nam at 84. But nam did ok at range with the recent ice event I think.
Well, it is the NAM, I don't trust it that much in this range...BUT......check out this trend of the last 4 runs of the doc....check out what is starting to show up in the northern branch and between the northern and southern branch...something to potentially watch as we go through the next few days......
This is the first system around the 20th correct?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ridge is much taller on the last frame! That’ll get it in the right direction!
