Cloud tops are warming so continued weakening at this time... if the core isn't really disrupted and shear still remains fairly light there is still potential for intensification (not Cat 4 imo) especially since the gulf stream is in it's path.
Looks like EPS slight westward shift, @KyloG will show the trend gifs soon I'm sure, I'm not that savvy... Lol
View attachment 22959
Channel 2 was basically parroting what's on NOAA's site. I had it open yesterday evening while the news was on and it was identical.I agree with this. Here in CHS I don't know anyone leaving and the sentiment is there will be beach erosion and flooding downtown, but that is about it. The storm isn't even coming up in conversation much. It was quiet for sure around town yesterday but I think most prepared earlier in the weekend. I was at Harris Teeter near Folly Beach and in Mt Pleasant yesterday as well as Target. Few shoppers and plenty of supplies.
Channel 2 this morning is showing maps that depict the probability of TS and Hurricane winds. They are praising the Euro and showing the storm will be well offshore but the wind field will expand. Even so, they've shown graphics with a 30% chance of hurricane force winds up to 80 MPH on the immediate coast/beaches only with scattered power outages a "possibility" and 4-7 feet of max storm surge in worst case scenario.
TBH, at least they are probably being realistic in the forecast if it holds, but if it changes there is going to be a mad dash for the exits. I'd say cautious optimism is appropriate at the moment for here.
Looks like EPS slight westward shift, @KyloG will show the trend gifs soon I'm sure, I'm not that savvy... Lol
View attachment 22959
sentiment shared ...
I believe we have a potential situation....sentiment shared ...
Looks like EPS slight westward shift, @KyloG will show the trend gifs soon I'm sure, I'm not that savvy... Lol
View attachment 22959
If that actually verifies we should just stop modeling and watch radar instead...agree....might be telling "go west"....literally.Anyone who has access, can they fill us in on what's happening with the trof/ridging on the ridiculous inland member? I think it's unlikely, but with the other members shifting it could be hinting at something.
If that actually verifies we should just stop modeling and watch radar instead...
I agree with ya 100%.....I've been waiting for the unexpected compared to the models.Yeah, I'm just interested in if it's a warning shot since the other members and what looks like the GEFS members are starting to shift West at this point.
Yeah, I can't remember which was which but two of them were windy and rainy (nothing severe in my area though), the other one we had a trace of rain and it was otherwise sunny and breezy that day. That was the one that caused trouble in NC and lots of problems for people caught in it who were trying to come back home.My buddy as his wife live on James Island in Charleston and they are not leaving. I can’t say I blame him. They didn’t leave for Mathew either. He said it was “a little breezy and wet” but that’s about it. ??
He will get notice before/if they close the bridge....he should keep an eye out so he doesn't get stuck....My buddy as his wife live on James Island in Charleston and they are not leaving. I can’t say I blame him. They didn’t leave for Mathew either. He said it was “a little breezy and wet” but that’s about it. ??
Do they close the bridge on Folly Road? I thought the rule was 40mph / bridge is 65' or higher = closed, and the one over the Stono there wasn't that high. They'd definitely close the one at John's Island because that one meets the height requirement.He will get notice before/if they close the bridge....he should keep an eye out so he doesn't get stuck....
FWIW, the 12z NAM is very similar to 6z except that it's 3 hours slower.
I'm not sure...Do they close the bridge on Folly Road? I thought the rule was 40mph / bridge is 65' or higher = closed, and the one over the Stono there wasn't that high. They'd definitely close the one at John's Island because that one meets the height requirement.