Broken024
Member
Still going at that point!ATL to CAE bullseye!!! ?
View attachment 70589
Still going at that point!ATL to CAE bullseye!!! ?
View attachment 70589
'Big Dog' might be an understatement if that was to actually happen.It wasn't even done!! modernweenie
View attachment 70593
Gotta love when Kuchera makes a better weenie map than 10:1.It wasn't even done!! modernweenie
View attachment 70593
I agree with everything you just said. Also something to add is that while the big push of Arctic air may be coming in the 2nd half of next week instead of the early in the week, I wouldn’t be shocked to start seeing models even cool things some early in the week... I’m not buying near 70 like the 12z GFS or anything close to it. 3 days ago temperatures here we’re supposed to be in the mid to upper 60s on Friday, now it’s looking like low 50s. We’ve seen warmups get muted like that all season. Obviously it’s a model bias in not recognizing the strength of blocking during certain time ranges and wanting to pump up the SER, but when it does recognize the strength of the block, it mutes the SERGeez, if you hang your hopes on each individual long range model run, you will go insane. It's pointless. The problem is, many only take into account a model run which fits their narrative (cold and snowy) taking it to the bank as gospel. Then when an alternate run comes about and destroys the narrative, then it's the end of the world. Ensembles are what I prefer to focus on. ALL the globals have been like a pogo stick this winter and can't be trusted more than 5 days, if that long.
In cases where big cold shots sweep across the country, it seems, in my limited memory, it is often delayed but not denied. Sort of like slow moving lava.
The models can’t handle the arctic cold mass! It’s so unusual, it’s so cold, they can’t compute it! They will flip flop horribly, till it gets closer! Think New Years 2017, I believe? Models had a horrible time with that